After more than a year of back room
deals and bribery. The Democrats passed
their health care “reform” bill on March
23rd 2010 against the will of the
majority of We The People. Click
here to view the new law. If you
don’t have the time to read the entire
bill (like most members of congress).
You can
click here for an excellent chart
published in the Wall Street Journal on
March 18th, 2010 that breaks down the
differences between all of the bills
proposed prior to the signing of the
final bill. Oh and the cost? Well
Representative Paul Ryan broke that down
for all of us at the recent 7 hour long
"Bi-Partisan Health Care Summit":
How did the Democrats pass a $2.4
Trillion bill that creates a new
$1 TRILLION entitlement by robbing
Social security and Medicare with
absolutely no bipartisan support? I will
now detail the Democrats ENTIRE
nightmarish process of incompetency and
blatant partisanship during their health
care reform efforts. But before I do,
let me first expose a little piece of
information that the Democrats DO NOT
want you to know.
If we were to simply cut the
$760 BILLION in annual waste
that exists in our current Health Care
system, we could provide EVERY SINGLE
ONE of the
46
Million Uninsured a Gold
Plated Health Care plan that would make
the CEO’s of Blue Cross Blue Shield
GREEN with envy. Oh, and it would only cost us
HALF of the
aforementioned $760 BILLION. So WHY in
GOD’s NAME do the Democrats want to
spend $2.4 TRILLION over the next 10
years to cover the 46 Million Uninsured
AND also MANDATE the purchase of
GOVERNMENT APPROVED HEALTH INSURANCE?
Because it’s not about health care, it’s
about
Tyranny.
In fact, the only thing that begins is
HIGHER TAXES (for those of us who
actually pay taxes and who most likely
ALREADY HAVE OUR OWN HEALTH INSURANCE!)
We were told by Obama & Pelosi that
children would be able to get coverage
on a guaranteed issue basis immediately
after the new bill was signed!
However, they FORGOT include that in the
bill! So now, NOT EVEN THAT
“benefit” will begin until 2014!
It’s a good thing that THAT IS ALREADY
THE LAW IN MOST STATES! The dramatic
expansion of SCHIP already ensures that
most children have access to guaranteed
issue health insurance already. In
addition, many States like Illinois have
already passed similar legislation that
allows children with pre-existing
conditions to be insured on a guaranteed
issue basis and to stay on their parents
policy until the age of 26. Side
bar: Are they REALLY still
children at age 26?
Even before
the "Public Option" provision in the
Senate bill
was killed, there was a provision in the
bill for States to "opt out" of the
Government Health Insurance option. I
wonder if this is because they actually
READ the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 9th or 10th
Amendment of our Constitution which
clearly prove that these bills are
UNCONSTITUTIONAL?
Remember when Speaker Pelosi said that
the bill will "not add ONE dime to the
deficit"? I can only assume that she
"mis-spoke" because these bills will add
MILLIONS OF DIMES TO OUR DEFICIT. In
fact, they are Ponzi schemes that would
make Bernie Madoff look like
a philanthropist!
These bills are economy KILLERS, Small
Business KILLERS and Middle Class
destroyers! Equally troubling is the
fact that those who have been chosen to
represent our best interests apparently
have NO IDEA that we have
NO MONEY to
pay for this! We have now
amassed a $12 TRILLION National Deficit.
With this reckless spending comes
consequences. The Inflation Institute
outlines exactly what those consequences
will be below in their short but
powerful film:
By the way, if you think EITHER of these
bills will cost less than $2.4 Trillion,
you might want to do your own due
diligence like the
CATO Institute did. John Boehner tells
us ALL ABOUT these bloated pieces of
Govt. special interest payola on
America's News Room:
An
even better assessment was made on 10/30/09
by Constitutional Attorney
Mark Levin of the
Landmark Legal Foundation. This could
be the reason why the Wall Street
Journal called the House bill "The
Worst Bill EVER". Worse yet!
These bills literally commit
HARD TYRANNY on the American citizen BY IMPRISONING AMERICAN CITIZENS FOR UP TO 5 YEARS if they don't BUY HEALTH INSURANCE!
Oh yeah it's in there! I have a natural
aversion to fine print. So I've taken
the Liberty of "blowing up the IRS code"
(pun intended).
Want more proof? Here's some clarification
on the fine and prison time clauses
directly from Congress
http://bit.ly/25P0Y0.
If you have not read
House Health Care
"Reform" Bill HR3200 yet,
below is a video that highlights some
gems from this nightmarish bill:
One of the most enjoyable videos I have
seen in a LONG time is the one where
Speaker Pelosi was asked by an intrepid
reporter if she felt it was "fair" to
imprison people who do not buy Health
Insurance. Always nice to see a
politician squirm when questioned about
their OWN LEGISLATION!
How are former Health Care reform activists responding to
this? Watch
MSNBC's
Dylan Ratigan Yell at Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) as
she tries to "spin" the truth about the health care "reform" bills.
Even the Patron Saint
of health care "reform" Dr. Howard Dean
is now saying KILL THIS BILL!
Keith Olbermann goes
a step further and states "I will got to
jail before I buy Obamacare Insurance!"
KILL THIS BILL!
Pelosi's
Bill will also cut $500 BILLION in
Medicare. What will that do? Listen to
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell
on 11/17/09
Congressman
Ed Whitfield (Kentucky) lists some other
"ugly truths" about Pelosi's "health
care reform" bill (also on 11/17/09):
Did I also mention
that Senator Barbara Mikulski's
(Maryland Democrat) bill that designates
ABORTION AS
PREVENTATIVE CARE just passed
in the Senate as well? This is
MADNESS! According to CBS News, there
are ONE MILLION VETERANS WAITING for
their disability claims RIGHT NOW
through the Veterans Administration & we
want to expand this bloated bureaucracy
nationwide? More MADNESS:
You may be asking yourself. HOW DID THIS
BILL GET PASSED? Well at first it was
hopeful that AT LEAST A FEW Democrats
would have a 'crisis of conscience" and
vote against the Senate bill. However,
their guilty conscience was quickly
appeased with MILLIONS & MILLIONS of
YOUR TAX DOLLARS. First, there was the
$300 MILLION bribe to Senator Mary
Landreiu (which is now known as the new
"Louisiana Purchase"). Senator Landreiu
was very public about her lack of
support for the health care bill. She
even told the press that "I
can not be bought" But after
she received YOUR MILLIONS for her
State, she quickly changed her vote to
"YES".
Then there was the
"Nebraska Purchase" to Senator Ben
Nelson. He was the last "holdout" in the
Senate. First, the Whitehouse
threatened to
close Offutt Air Force Base
in Nelson's home state if he did not
vote "Yes". Once this threat was exposed
in the media, the Democrats chose to
fall back on the tried and true
negotiation tactic known as "PAYOLA".
After Senator Nelson & Senator Reid
spent 13 hours behind closed doors.
Senator Nelson (a former staunch
advocate against funding abortions with
tax dollars) ALL OF A SUDDEN changed his
vote to a "YES". Why? Because his State
would now be
EXEMPT FROM PAYING
ANY ADDITIONAL MEDICAID COSTS ASSOCIATED
WITH THE PASSAGE OF THIS BUREAUCRATIC
MONSTROSITY! Funny how a
MILLIONS OF YOUR TAX DOLLARS can "ease
the conscience" of your elected
officials!
Those are only 2 of
the dirty back room deals cut by Harry
Reid. For a complete list of every
"dirty deed" see
The Washington
Post.
Here's how Harry Reid
makes his back room deals:
How exactly can
President Obama state that he "will
not increase taxes on the middle class"
if he allows these massive 1,990 & 2074
paged TRAIN WRECKS to pass? Does he not
know what American's think about these
bills? Did he not here us in Washington
D.C on the steps of our nation's capitol
at the "KILL THE BILL" rally on November
5, 2009?
Senator Jim DeMint
(R-S.C.) pointed out some VERY
DISTURBING language in the Senate health
care bill during floor remarks on
12/21/09. First, he noted that there are
a number of changes to Senate rules in
the bill--and it's supposed to take a
2/3 vote to change the rules! And then
he pointed out that the Reid bill
declares on
page 1020
that the Independent Medicare Advisory
Board cannot be repealed by
future Congresses! This is
unprecedented legislation that is
tantamount to TYRANNY!
With all of the
aforementioned evidence stacked against
the health care bills. Senate Democrats
STILL say Republicans are "evil" for
opposing it. My favorite video showing
the Democrat's "righteous indignation"
towards Republicans was the recent
drunken tirade by Max Baucus from the
floor of the U.S. Senate. That's right,
I said DRUNKEN tirade from the floor of
the US Senate:
BEFORE Democrats snuck 75 "phantom"
amendments in to the bill (which were
NOT scored by the CBO). On October 7th,
2009 the CBO was then commissioned to
score the first 1502 paged Senate reform bill
hilariously named
America's Healthy Future Act of 2009.
The assessment (at first) seemed to be
more favorable than the earlier score
given to HR3200 back in July. That is of
course, until
Price Waterhouse Cooper exposed the TRUE COSTof
the Democrat's Health Insurance reform
bills. Let's just say the word ROB
doesn't even begin to describe what an abject
failure
the Democrats "reform" bills would be.
Moreover, not only will the bills NOT be
deficit neutral, they will actually end
up costing Tax Payers
dramatically more for their health insurance
For excellent in depth video commentary
on Price Waterhouse Cooper'scost
analysis please watch the informative
video below:
Democrats have made it clear that they believe
that health care is a "Fundamental
Right". However, no one seems to be
discussing the "fundamental rights" we LOSEunder
both of these bills. In fact, if it were not for Patriotic American Tax
Paying Citizens voicing their INFORMED dissent at Town Hall Meetings
across the country AND the
ONE MILLION NINE HUNDRED EIGHTY SIX THOUSAND
Patriots who showed up in Washington D.C. on 09/12/09.
President Obama and a Democrat controlled House & Senate would have MOST
DEFINITELY passed HR3200 in it's original
UGLY form!
The sad truth
is the vast majority of the population (and the majority of Senators)
have not bothered to actually READ the 1,000 plus paged HR3200 bill or
the 1,502 paged "America's Healthy Future Act of 2009. To save us time
the U.S. Chamber of Commerce outlined the fundamental rights we loose
under the HR3200 bill
Click here to read their analysis. An
even better in depth analysis was recently completed by...wait for
it....an ACTUAL Insurance Broker with 22 years of experience in.....wait
for it.....The Health Insurance Industry! What a concept! Consult with
those who actually know what they're talking about! His excellent in
depth analysis of the
House Health Care "Reform" Bill HR3200can be found on his web
site @
www.wrongreform.com
Regarding America's Healthy Choices Act. All you need to do is read
Section 2203 entitled "Guaranteed Issue and Renewal For
Insurance Plans" (starting on
Page 19). In this section we enter in to
what I like to call "Lawmaker La La Land" where not only must an
Insurance company COVER ALL APPLICANTS REGARDLESS OF PRE-EXISTING
CONDITIONS, but they also are PROHIBITED from charging ANYTHING EXTRA
because of pre-existing conditions. For those that have no idea how
health insurance works (like those in the Senate who actually wrote this
ridiculous legislation) I'll quote (in part) directly from the
Wall Street Journal article of 8/12/09.
"If insurers are forced to sell coverage to everyone at any time,
many people will buy insurance only when they need medical care. This
raises the cost of insurance for everyone else, in particular those who
are responsible enough to buy insurance before they need it; they end
up paying even higher premiums. And the more expensive the insurance,
the less likely people will buy it before they need it.
That's one reason that only five states—Maine,
Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Vermont—have Mr. Obama's
proposal for "guaranteed issue" on the books today. New Hampshire and
Kentucky repealed such laws after finding that they soon had an even
smaller individual insurance market as companies fled the state.
Another proposed reform known as "community
rating" imposes uniform premiums regardless of health condition. This
also blows up the individual insurance market, by making it far more
expensive for young, healthy or low-risk consumers to join pools—if they
join at all. And if the healthy don't join risk pools, then premiums go
up for everyone and insurers have little choice but to reduce their risk
by refusing to cover those who have a high chance of getting sick, such
as people with a history of cancer. This is why 35 states today impose
no limits whatsoever on how much insurers can vary premiums and six
states allow wide variation among consumers.
New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts have both
community rating and guaranteed issue. And, no surprise, they have the
three most expensive individual insurance markets among all 50 states,
with premiums roughly two to three times higher than the rest of the
country. In 2007, the average annual premium in New Jersey was $5,326
for singles and in New York $12,254 for a family, versus the national
average of $2,613 and $5,799, respectively. Obama Care would impose New
York-type rates nationwide."
So you see Health Insurance is about MANAGEMENT of
RISK. Insuring everyone regardless of medical history and without
charging anything extra is actuarially UNSOUND. Since Health Insurance
companies have to be fiscally responsible, such practices lead to
unmanageable risk and in turn unaffordable premiums. This is exactly why
a Federal "Public Option" could NEVER POSSIBLY be considered "Healthy
Competition". Why? Because insurance companies can not tap in to the
Federal reserve when claims exceed revenue. A Federal "Public Option"
would most certainly do so (as the Federal Government has been doing
feverishly lately).
This is
clearly
NOT
the way to "reform" our health care system and this is why we have seen
predominantly Liberal news outlets like
The New York Post,
The Huffington Post,
Salon.com and The
Washington Post vehemently condemn President Obama's "Health
Care"...er...."Health Insurance" reform plans. Whilst both parties (and
most American's) feel that something has to be done. The question is,
what is the best course of action? There are still those who actually
believe that a
"Single Payer" system would be the best
option. The President does not agree,
One of the most passionate statements
made by any Congressman thus far on the
current health insurance reform debate
was made by Michigan Congressman Mike
Rogers. After actually READING the
bills, he had some genuine concerns and
he was not afraid to voice them and boy
did he EVER voice his concerns!
For those of you old enough to
remember Jack Webb, you will thoroughly enjoy his
thoughts on President Obama's plans here:
Nevertheless, we still definitely
need health care reform on many levels and if Government
must play a part, there are intelligent things they can
do. Here’s where they can actually help:
Eliminate
the ridiculous State imposed Mandates that PROHIBIT
Health Insurers from offering coverage in EVERY
SINGLE STATE! For example, Small Businesses in
California have roughly 6 (yes that's six) options
for Health Insurance. Yet there are 1,300 Health
Insurance companies in America! States like Colorado
FORCE carriers to cover "substance abuse" which
DOUBLES the Health Insurance premiums in Colorado
(you can now waive "substance abuse" coverage and
your premium is subsequently reduced BY HALF!). This
kind of State Mandate (and so many more) is what
prevent the majority of Health Insurance carriers
from offering their products in every State.
Basic economics 101 teaches us that NOTHING
increases quality and drives down prices LIKE
COMPETITION! How can we increase quality and
competition when we stifle it by imposing ridiculous
mandates that inhibit competition from the get go?
All 1,300 Health Insurance carriers should be able
to offer ALL of their products in EVERY SINGLE
STATE. This way if you do not like your current
coverage you have 1, 299 OTHER OPTIONS. With that
many options available, carriers are NATURALLY
FORCED BY THE RULES OF COMPETITION AND FREE MARKET
ENTERPRISE to IMPROVE not only the quality of their
products but to also improve their customer service
OR THE CONSUMER WILL PURCHASE their Health Insurance
from 1,299 other carriers! It's as simple as that!
Also, actuarial tables teach us that the more lives
that are in the pool, the lower the premiums for
all. How much lower could premiums be if everyone in
EACH state had 1300 carriers to choose from? This is
why I support the repeal of the outdated
McCarran-Ferguson-Act of 1945
Instead
of bailing out GM with Billions of our blood sweat
and tears and then letting them file bankruptcy 3
months later. Why not expand State Run High Risk
Pools to ALL States for those who are rendered
uninsurable? We already have such State Run High
Risk Health Insurance pools in the
majority of States.
These Risk Pools will cover anyone regardless of
their medical history. The problem is they are under
funded so the premiums are extremely high. Instead
of spending up to
$2.6 TRILLION over
the next decade to insure only 20 Million of the 45
Million uninsured. LEAVE the bulk of the nation's
risk where the money is, namely with the insurance
companies. Since the uninsured FAR outweigh the
uninsurable, this would cost far less than the
currently proposed $2.6 Trillion over the next 10
years.
Update
the outdated Health Insurance Portability laws
(regarding credit for pre-existing conditions) to
INCLUDE Individual Health Insurance Policies. As it
stands now, HIPAA law allows an insured to move from
one "Employer Sponsored Group Health Insurance Plan"
to another "Employer Sponsored Group Health
Insurance Plan" and receive FULL coverage for
"pre-existing" conditions so long as they can prove
to the new carrier that they have had 18 months of
prior coverage with no lapse of more than 63 days.
Millions of American Entrepreneurs have chosen to
leave Corporate America and strike out on their own
since these outdated laws were written in the 1990's.
As the face of our work force changes so too should
the laws that protect it. Most especially since
these entrepreneurs shoulder the BULK of the
nation's risk and PAY the bulk of the nation's tax
load! Throw them a legal bone!
Make
ALL Health Insurance 100% TAX DEDUCTIBLE! I say ALL
Health Insurance because employer sponsored health
insurance IS 100% tax deductible BUT it's NOT tax
deductible if you purchase your own Individual
Health Insurance policy on the open market.
Educate the American consumer about the primary
reason for the high cost of health insurance!
Namely, LOW DEDUCTIBLE, LOW CO PAY (a.k.a.
Traditional) Health Insurance. NOTHING drives up the
cost of Health Insurance like maintaining a low
deductible, low co pay plan. Instead, offer new more
intelligent option to the American Consumer like "Consumer
Driven Tax Qualified Health Insurance".
There simply is no more intelligent or cost
effective way to insure anyone. The sad part is,
these Consumer Driven Tax Qualified concepts have
been around for more than a DECADE! Yet, only a
small minority of the American population has even
explored these intelligent (& much lower priced)
Health Insurance alternatives. Those that have, are
WAY AHEAD of the rest of population when it comes to
managing medical risk.
I would say weed out the 12
million Illegals (that we know about) who are
sucking our Medicaid system dry...but as Congressman
Joe Wilson so aptly stated, Obama CLEARLY wants to
"provide a
PATH TO CITIZENSHIPfor
the 10 to 12 million Illegals in our country". Once
they're legal, he can then cover them ALL on our tax
dollar! So YES his plan IS to cover Illegals, he'll
just make em legal first! Think they're not sucking
our Medicaid system dry? Just visit California or
Illinois. Good old “Blago” enrolled thousands of
Illegals in to our Medicaid system, thereby running
the program in the ground & leaving our Illinois
Medicaid system approx.
$1.5 BILLION behind in payment
of claims
to physicians who have been providing “free” care to
all illegals who were lucky enough to flock to the
State of Illinois to insure themselves for “free”.
In fact, according to the U.S. Census Bureau 10 to
12 Million of the Uninsured in America are illegal
aliens. Who comprise the rest?
Find out here.
TORT REFORM! This is one area of
reform that is rarely spoken of by the Liberal left.
Medical malpractice liability forces providers into
practicing defensive medicine. In other words, it
causes medical practitioners to order multiple
expensive (and often times unnecessary) tests and
procedures "in defense of" potential lawsuits, JUST
IN CASE they miss something in a patient's case. All
for fear of being sued for ridiculous amounts in a
malpractice lawsuit. Limiting liability lawsuit
awards to reasonable amounts will deter those who
seek the "big pay day" by filing frivolous lawsuits
against medical practitioner.
Establish a Federal oversight
committee to regulate and hold accountable
physicians who make medical mistakes. What’s one of
the biggest reasons why health care is so expensive?
Hint: It’s not “rich CEO’s” and “outdated medical
records transfer processes.” It’s Medical Mistakes!
Here’s the real facts you won’t find in the media
outlets:
1994: Five years after a
groundbreaking Institute of Medicine report focused
attention on medical errors in hospitals, Americans say
that they do not believe that the nation’s quality of
care has improved. In fact, 1 out of 3 patients states
that they have experienced a serious medical
error
http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.w4.534
1995: A Study published in the Journal of American
Medical Association (JAMA) found that only two percent
of medication errors that occurred during the medication
administration process were intercepted. a. More
people die from medication errors than from work place
injuries b. Medication errors account for
approximately one out of 131 outpatient deaths and one
out of 854 inpatient deaths.
1999: Institute of Medicine (IOM)
releases its first report on healthcare quality and
medical errors.
http://www.iom.edu/?id=12735 The Study finds in part
that:
a. Medical errors are
responsible for injury in as many as 1 out of every 25
hospital patients. b. Between
44,000 and 98,000 Americans die each year from
preventable medical errors in hospitals alone.
c. The deaths from preventable medical mistakes are
equivalent to the number of people who would die if a
jumbo jet crashed EACH AND EVERY DAY OF THE
YEAR, and all its passengers died!
d. Medical errors cause more deaths than motor vehicle
accidents, breast cancer or AIDS…..and this study is TEN
YEARS OLD and STILL no Federal oversight committee!
Oh wait! It gets worse!
2002: A Study issued by the United
States Pharmacopeia (USP) concluded that more than
200,000 medication errors occurred during 2002
2004: CDC reports that 90,000 patient
deaths occur each year due to patients contracting
hospital acquired infections.
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/nnis/2004NNISreport.pdf
a. Many hospital acquired infections are caused by
health care workers who fail to wash their hands in
between patients.
Preventable medical errors result in
extended hospital stays, expensive treatment for chronic
medical conditions and astronomical medical costs that
are associated with treating debilitating life-long
illnesses. Some experts state that these costs may be in
the range of $150-200 Billion dollars per year. Gee,
where else could we spend that money??? Quick reminder:
ALL of the aforementioned happened
under the nose of our Federal Government. And we want
them to regulate Health Care?? Let’s not save ALL of our
anger for the “greedy” insurance companies and “over
paid” doctors and CEO’s. Let’s focus our Anger on our
GOVERNMENT who has allowed this systemic problem to
continue over three administrations!
Ask yourself, why does the health
care industry basically regulate and report on itself?
Why is certification and accreditation voluntary? Why
don’t we have a Federal agency that acts like the FAA
and investigate medical mistakes, just like airline
accidents or near misses? Why do only some states have
mandatory reporting requirements of medical errors? All
Good Questions that need to be answered before we hand
over our very health freedoms to the same Government to
“regulate”.
In summary,
REAL healthcare reform can be accomplished through
consumer education, weeding out abuse of
existing Federal entitlement programs (via a legitimate
needs assessment) and increased funding and expansion of
existing State sponsored Risk Pools so that people who
are declined for insurance have an affordable option to
continue coverage if declined on the individual major
medical market. Following these few simple steps will go
a long way towards not only maintaining our current
health care system, but also towards keeping the bulk of
our nations risk where it belongs, namely with the
private health insurance industry. In light of the
recent multi Trillion Dollar "Bail Outs" and many other
failing corporations coming to the table with their hats
in their hands (and their private jets on the tarmac)
the last thing our government should do is start cutting
more blind "bail out" checks in an effort to "reform"
the U.S. health care system.
The big
question is, why is Congress not listening to the cries
of We The People? Listen to the frustration of this CA
Small Biz Owner:
More
importantly why are they not listening to the THOUSANDS
of physicians who DO NOT support these "reform" bills?
But hey what do I know? The video below sure
makes Government sound wonderful! I mean just look at
their track record!
What this Administration (and others
before it) do not seem to understand are the basic
fundamental principles and guidelines our Founders knew
long before our current fiscal insolvency. For a
refresher course on the wisdom of our Founders watch
this:
By the way, unlike the lies told by
the Democrats. Conservative Republicans DO HAVE a plan
to reform our nation's health insurance system. It is
called the "Empowering
Patient's First Act"
or HR3400. If you ever wondered what the differences are
between Conservatives and Liberals this
Power Point Presentation sums it up quite
nicely. Here's what's coming this year for Democrats:
Watch the brief Customer service
videos below for a brief snapshot of what we have to
look forward to under Obamacare:
Dick Morris breaks down what could
really happen if Obamacare passes:
Now that you've read all this please
take the "Red Pill" (in liquid form) to forget all about
the nightmare described above:
Universal Health Care. What Are
The Facts? Would It Work For The United States?
Since there are so many ideas
on the table, it is difficult to know what the right course
of action is. Most especially when you are on the outside
looking in. One thing we know for sure is an NHS system or a
"Single Payer" system has NEVER worked in other countries.
All one needs to do is open any newspaper and read
the
thousands of medical horror storiesexperienced
by those who are victims of such systems. Recently ABC's
20/20 program did an in depth study of this issue. The
result of which clearly outlined the problems with the U.S.
Health Care System, and outlined a clear & concise path
regarding what needs to be done on a National scale to truly
reform our Health Care System. If you have not seen the
20/20 episode entitled "Sick in America" with John Stossel.
Please take the time to watch all 6 videos. It will take
about 45 min of your time but it is well worth it to know
what's really going on and what can be done
right now
to accomplish REAL reform without spending
Trillions of U.S. Tax Payer Dollars. In fact, it
will SAVE us money!
Sick in America" (Part 1 of 6)
"Sick in
America" (Part 2 of 6)
"Sick in
America" (Part 3 of 6)
"Sick in
America" (Part 4 of 6)
"Sick in
America" (Part 5 of 6)
"Sick in
America" (Part 6 of 6)
A
common example used to further the cause of adopting a
Single Payer system in the United States is to point out how
well it is working in countries such as France and Canada.
20/20 touches on this in the above episode. However, very
few have done a more in depth study of Canada's Single Payer
system than documentary film maker Stuart Browning. For even
more about what is really going on with the Canadian health
care system please watch his short but very informative
documentary videos below. Again, well worth your time.
What's it like JUST TO SEE A DOCTOR with Canada's Single
Payer System? Watch Steven Crowder's hidden camera video:
Health Broker
- Rick Baker (featured in the above film) asks you to help
stop Congress from adopting Canada's system by signing the
petition at
www.freeourhealthcarenow.com
Please
help secure your rights to your own health care choices.
Why is Rick so passionate about his plea for your help in
stopping the adoption of a Government Run Health Care System
for all Americans? Because certain "progressive" states have
already adopted such State Run Health Care Systems.
Take a look at what happened to Barbara Wagner who was a
victim of the "Oregon Public Health Insurance Plan". When
Government runs ANYTHING it's all about price containment
and not the Health & Welfare of the Patient.
Medical care in the United States is
derided as miserable compared to health care systems in the
rest of the developed world. Economists, government
officials, insurers and academics alike are beating the drum
for a far larger government role in health care. Much
of the public assumes their arguments are sound because the
calls for change are so ubiquitous and the topic so complex.
However, before turning to government as the solution, some
unheralded facts about America's health care system should
be considered, says Scott W. Atlas, a senior fellow at the
Hoover Institution and a professor at the Stanford
University Medical Center.
Americans have better survival rates than Europeans for
common cancers:
Breast cancer mortality is 52 percent higher in
Germany than in the United States, and 88 percent higher
in the United Kingdom.
Prostate cancer mortality is 604 percent higher in
the United Kingdom and 457 percent higher in Norway.
The mortality rate for colorectal cancer among
British men and women is about 40 percent higher.
Americans have better access to treatment for chronic
diseases than patients in other developed countries:
Some 56 percent of Americans who could benefit are
taking statins, which reduce cholesterol and protect
against heart disease.
By comparison, of those patients who could benefit
from these drugs, only 36 percent of the Dutch, 29
percent of the Swiss, 26 percent of Germans, 23 percent
of Britons and 17 percent of Italians receive them.
Lower income Americans are in better health than
comparable Canadians:
Twice as many American seniors with below-median
incomes self-report "excellent" health compared to
Canadian seniors (11.7 percent versus 5.8 percent).
Conversely, white Canadian young adults with
below-median incomes are 20 percent more likely than
lower income Americans to describe their health as "fair
or poor."
Americans spend less time waiting for care than patients
in Canada and the United Kingdom:
Canadian and British patients wait about twice as
long -- sometimes more than a year -- to see a
specialist, to have elective surgery like hip
replacements or to get radiation treatment for cancer.
All told, 827,429 people are waiting for some type
of procedure in Canada.
In England, nearly 1.8 million people are waiting
for a hospital admission or outpatient treatment.
Because of how the Single Payer System is designed,
citizens of England & Canada have NO WHERE NEAR the choices
that we as American citizens do. As a matter of fact, until
very recently (2005) it was simply not possible for a
Canadian citizen to pay for their own health care or to
purchase private medical insurance that would "bump them up
the long waiting list" for medical treatments. The reason
Canadian citizens now have the right to do so (and it is
still limited) is a direct result of long hard battles (many
that are still being fought) that have been waged by brave
Canadian citizens like Dr. Jacques Chaoulli who took his
clients case all the way to the Canadian supreme court and
won! Dr. Chaoulli (http://www.healthcoalition.ca/chaoulli.html)
and his patient, George Zeliotis, launched their legal
challenge to the Canadian government's monopolized
healthcare system after waiting more than a year for
hip-replacement surgery.
Canada's high court found
for the plaintiffs and in doing so issued the following
statement: "The evidence in this case shows that delays in
the public healthcare system are widespread, and that, in
some serious cases, patients die as a result of waiting
lists for public healthcare. The evidence also demonstrates
that the prohibition against private health insurance and
its consequence of denying people vital healthcare result in
physical and psychological suffering that meets a threshold
test of seriousness." Furthermore, Justice Marie Deschamps
said, "Many patients on non-urgent waiting lists are in pain
and cannot fully enjoy any real quality of life. The right
to life and to personal inviolability is therefore affected
by the waiting times."
Furthermore, the Vancouver, British Columbia-based
Fraser Institute which keeps track of Canadian waiting times for various
medical procedures. According to the Fraser Institute's 14th annual
edition of "Waiting Your Turn: Hospital Waiting Lists in Canada (2006),"
total waiting time between referral from a general practitioner and
treatment, averaged across all 12 specialties and 10 provinces surveyed,
rose from 17.7 weeks in 2003 to 17.9 weeks in 2006. Depending on which
Canadian province you live in, a simple MRI requires a wait between 7
and 33 weeks! Orthopedic surgery could require a wait of 14 weeks for a
referral from a general practitioner to the specialist and then another
24 weeks from the specialist to treatment! For even more real life
horror stories about Canadian citizens left in the lurch by the Canadian
healthcare system read the well researched and fact based Wall Street
Journal article entitled "Too Old For Hip Surgery" here:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123413701032661445.html?mod=article-outset-box
This is what happens when you put government in control of your health
care decisions. Doing so in this country, would be nothing short of a
train wreck. Anyone who thinks otherwise is simply uninformed or
"willfully ignorant".
What has our government done, to convince people to
hand over our very health freedoms for it to govern over?
Katrina……..?
Fannie Mae – bailout? (this is a government entity who's employee's
receive bonuses!) What other government employee receives bonuses for
doing their jobs?
Social security – bankrupt ? (robbed for other expenditures)
Medicaid – ? (robbed for other expenditures)
$2 trillion Porkulus bill - ? (and growing)
AIG – bail out, yet nobody knows where's the money gone? No committee of
oversight in place (was promised by our representatives to be in place
immediately)
Gas prices - ? (50% of every dollar at the pump goes to Washington) But
who did you point your finger at as the problem?
Since our government "cannot" be sued, how will one be able to be
recompensed for its malfeasance or neglect? How will the government,
once it tells 300 million people "go see the doctor we will pay all the
bills", be able to control the consequences? By overwhelming our medical
profession or breaking it, will come another "grand government
solution," we need more money to fix it"! You are already familiar and
have accepted this excuse for too long, and know this to be their power
solution. Our government has impoverished our families' financial
freedom to pay our own way, by immoral taxation. Want to know what such
a government endeavor will cost the U.S. Tax Payer? Read the April 12,
2009 Wall Street Journal article entitled "The End of Private Health
Insurance"
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123958544583612437.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Is Health
Care A Fundamental Right? If So What Should Governments Role Be?
As a multi-state Licensed Broker/Agent, I
have been providing quality Health Insurance services for
hundreds of families and Small Businesses around the
country for the last 15 years and I have seen first hand how
WELL our health care system works and how well our Health
Insurance system works. I have seen first hand (over and
over again) what happens when a Health Insurance company
pays claims (by the hundreds of thousands) thereby
protecting the financial future of their insured and
ensuring that they receive the very best medical treatment.
Specifically by allowing them access to expensive medical
procedures that they could never afford on their own. I
have also helped many consumers obtain access to legitimate
major medical Health Insurance even if they were labeled as
"uninsurable" on the open market.
Yet time and time again, I read how "evil" insurance
companies are and how greedy their CEOs are and how they
routinely deny medical procedures and refuse coverage to
those who are "deserving" of such coverage. I have also
heard many times how health care should be a "basic
fundamental right" of all Americans. Even though, none of
our founding fathers had any such "fundamental rights" in
mind when crafting our Bill of Rights or our Constitution.
Yet nearly half of the U.S. population thinks that we
should turn entirely to the U.S. Government for the answer
to health care reform. They feel as though a "Public
Option" that would "compete" with private industry would
solve the problem. Or worse yet they want a "Single
Payer" system much like Canada has now.
You may be
wondering yourself, is Government the solution?
The late President
Ronald Reagan summed it up
best when he said: “Government is not the solution, it is
the problem”. But way before him, our forefathers warned of
INSIDIOUS government involvement in our daily lives. Look at
their wisdom hundreds of years before our present situation:
Regarding adopting failed Single Payer health care options
like other foreign governments have. What did Washington
say? “Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence, (I
conjure you to believe me fellow citizens) the jealousy of a
free people ought to be constantly awake; since HISTORY AND
EXPERIENCE prove that foreign influence is one of the most
baneful foes of Republican Government".
Washington again at his Farewell Address,
September 19, 1796. Regarding using others blood sweat and
tears to pay for those who have not earned: What did
Jefferson say? “ To take from one, because it is thought
that his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired
too much in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers
have NOT exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate
arbitrarily the first principle of association, the
guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry,
and the fruits acquired by it.”
How does this apply today?
46% of American’s pay absolutely no
INCOME taxes! That means the rest of us have the privilege
of paying for all entitlements (which are ever expanding).
Most recent case in point:
Last year, SCHIP covered about 7 million
low-income children and Medicaid covered an additional 23
million. This year, 2009, the U.S House of Representatives
passed the H.R.2 SCHIP Expansion Bill which adds another 6.5
million children to Medicaid. In fact, according to U.S.
Census Bureau data, 42 million children will now be
eligible. The bill also allows States to receive federal
reimbursement for adding more immigrant children and
pregnant immigrant mothers, and removes the 5 year waiting
period now required for legal immigrants to be eligible.
This would enable immigrants to become eligible for health
benefits the moment they get here!
Currently, the present income eligibility
cap is $44,000 for a family of 4. The new bill raised the
Medicaid limit to $66,000. New York will even include
families who earn $88,000 and other states allow families to
subtract from their income calculation what they spend on
rent or mortgage or heating or food or transportation. This
means that children in some families who have incomes well
over $100,000 will now be eligible. With the median U.S.
household income around $50,000, 60% of U.S. households
still earning less than $62,000. This means that 3 out of 5
American households will now qualify for free health care
for their children. It also means that the other 2 out of 5
households will have the burden of paying for all of this!
Back to our forefathers: Jefferson’s
Letter to Joseph Milligan, April 6, 1816: ” There lies the
distinction of “charity” or coercion. Here stands Jefferson
who feared that if citizens became lazy, apathetic, and
IRRESPONSIBLE, government would gain ground and become
tyrannical and corrupt, plundering taxpayers for special
interests and violating even property rights and other
freedoms.”
How does this apply today?
With the help of the U.S. Census Bureau, let’s break down
the real empirical data behind the “50 million uninsured” in
America. Who exactly are they? FACTS:
17 Million live in households
earning more than $50,000 (38% of American uninsured)
9 Million live in households earning more than
$75,000 (20% of American uninsured)
18 Million of the “young invincibles” (ages 18-34)
who spend more money on “cigarettes, entertainment & cell phone bills.
(40% of uninsured)
There are also 12 Million illegal aliens (and
growing) who don't buy Health Insurance but still get "free" health
care.
So how many are legitimately uninsured? About 8 Million. That's just 18%
of the 45 Million we constantly here about.
Back to our Forefathers: Jefferson again:
“We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt ($3
Trillion Dollar “Porkulus Maximus” Bill) We must make our
election between economy and liberty, or Profusion and
servitude. If we run into such debts, as that we must be
taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and
our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our
callings and our creeds, as the people of England are, our
people, like them, must come to labor sixteen hours in the
twenty-four, give the earnings of fifteen of these to the
government for their debts and daily expenses; and the
sixteenth being insufficient to afford us bread, we must
live, as they now do, on OATMEAL and potatoes; have no time
to think, no means of calling the mismanagers to account;
(government) but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring
ourselves to rivet their CHAINS on the necks of our
fellow-sufferers…private fortunes are destroyed by public
(government) as well private extravagance. Till the bulk of
the society is reduced to be mere automations of
misery……than begins, indeed, the bellum omnium in omnia (War
of all against all) …..and the fore horse of this frightful
team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train
wretchedness and oppression.” (Letter to Samuel Kerchival,
July 12, 1816)
How does this apply today?
Where is the outrage that our children
already, BEFORE BEING BORN are now in debt to the government
by $35,000 ! Nice immoral profit I say by our government and
we haven’t even begun down the slippery slope to “Universal
Health Care.” Even before we begin, the $3 Trillion
“Porkulus Maximus” Bail Out continues to grow as more and
more corporations come to the capital with their hat in
their hands and their private jets on the tarmac.
Back to our Forefathers: Jefferson again:
“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation
of ideas which he DISBELIEVES and abhors is sinful and
tyrannical.” – Thomas Jefferson
John Adams (Vice President US for 2 terms
1788-1796, and in 1796 became our Second President) On
taxation : “Property is surely a right of mankind as real as
liberty. Perhaps, at first, prejudice, habit, shame or fear,
principle or religion would restrain the poor from attacking
the rich, and the idle from usurping on the industrious; but
the time would not be long before courage and enterprise
(political opportunists) would come and pretexts be invented
(socialist agenda) by degrees to countenance the majority in
dividing all the property among them, or at least in sharing
it equally with its present possessors. Debts would be
abolished first; taxes laid HEAVY on the rich, and not at
all on the others; (46% of American’s pay NO income tax) and
at last a downright equal division of everything be
demanded, and voted. What would be the consequence of this?
The idle, the vicious, the intemperate would rush into the
utmost extravagance of debauchery, sell and spend all their
share, and than demand a NEW division of those who PURCHASED
from them.’
Thomas Pain (1737–1809) “If, from the
more wretched parts of the old world, we look at those which
are in an advanced stage of improvement, we still find the
greedy hand of government thrusting itself into every corner
and crevice of industry, and grasping the spoil of the
multitude. Invention is continually exercised, to furnish
new pretenses for revenues and taxation. It watches
prosperity as its prey and permits none to escape without
tribute.”
Daniel Webster (1782-1852) “An unlimited
power to tax involves, necessarily, the power to DESTROY.”
How do these comments apply today?
If taxation strengthens a government,
while relieving it’s citizens of the freedoms above
forewarned from our Forefathers, how can anyone believe
taxing Americans at 60% or more (to fund a "public option")
is the solution? What else could stifle personal drive and
achievement more than even more taxation?
Regarding a “Public Option.” There are
several reasons why a Public Option will not work. Firstly,
the private sector can not compete with a Public Option. So
the lie that it will just create “healthy competition” is
just that. An INSIDIOUS Lie perpetrated by a Government with
an unholy lust for even more power. Why is it a lie?
Because unlike the Federal Government who
can tap in to the U.S. Treasury (as they have been doing
feverishly lately) when claims surpass revenue. The private
sector is held to a higher standard. Namely, fiscal
responsibility. If claims supercede revenue, an insurance
company must be held to the ramifications that happen to any
company that does not balance it’s portfolio correctly.
Namely, FAILURE (except, of course if that company is AIG
who gets bailed out over AND OVER again by our precious
BLOOD SWEAT and TEARS)!
SIDE BAR: Quick Translation of the term
“Blood Sweat & Tears” for the aforementioned 46%. “Blood
Sweat & Tears” means income taxes.
SIDE BAR: Further clarification of the
term “income tax”. This is a percentage of income that is
forcibly taken from roughly half of the American population
when they produce an income.
Once the insurance companies fail
(shortly after the “Public Option” starts promoting “Healthy
Competition”) we will be left with “Medicare” for all! But
wait! How’s Medicaid & Medicare working now? Let’s see. At
the current rate of Medicare expenditures, by the time I am
65 there will be no Medicare for me according to ALL
economist (on both sides of the isle). Why? Because they
have been robbed for other expenditures by a fiscally
irresponsible, over burdensome Federal Government. Who’s
answer to EVERYTHING is to throw money at it! Easy to throw
when it’s not yours.
The private sector does not have the
luxury to play with America’s BLOOD SWEAT & TEARS. We must
balance our portfolios responsibly and consistently or we
will not have the the funds to pay the big claims when they
arise (and they do arise, and they do so often). This being
the case, it comes down to who the American Tax Payers
(again, I stress the 50% that actually pay income taxes)
want to handle their medical care. And overwhelming, those
tax payers want choice and fiscal responsibility. They will
receive neither through a government run “Public Option.”
Ok, well then we’ll just lean on
Medicaid. Really? Will that be before or after the recent
Medicaid Expansion of $87 Billion is used up or after the
78.2 MILLION Baby Boomers suck it dry to care for their long
term care expenses? Gimme a break!
By the way, ever wonder why 35 Million
American's don’t purchase Health Insurance? Because it’s
FREE!!! There are hundreds of Free Hospitals & Clinics
around the country:
http://www.healthcentral.com/diabetes/c/17/66884/affordable-medical
Add to that the “compassionate care” that any one can get at
every Emergency Room in the U.S. and is there any wonder why
so many choose not to insure themselves? But that’s the
point here. NOTHING is “free”! It’s all on the backs of the
54% of American’s who actually pay income taxes and this
already MASSIVE burden will increase exponentially once
Health Care is “FREE” for everyone!
Does this mean then that we should stop
providing for those who are truly in need? Of course not. In
fact, providing for those who are truly in need is one of
the things that makes America great. We not only provide for
those in our own country but we spill our precious blood on
foreign soil around the globe defending the rights of our
allies and protecting Liberty. We will continue to do so. My
point is that what used to be entitlements for those who
legitimately need them has now become entitlements for those
who can MOST CERTAINLY provide for themselves.
What our forefathers envisioned was a
“Just Society”. A Society that grows great upon the efforts
of each citizens efforts and yet remembers that there are
those amongst us WHO CAN NOT (due to infirmity, age, mental
disability, disenfranchisement etc.) And we have always
provided for those who are truly in need. And we will
continue to do so.
Fiscal Conservatives believe
wholeheartedly in helping those that are truly in need. But
those that are not truly in need should PROVIDE FOR
THEMSELVES! The decision to help those truly in need should
be made by the hearts and minds of the individual citizen,
not funded through increased tax dollars by an ever
encroaching government.
Bill & Melinda Gates have contributed
Billions of dollars to humanitarian efforts inside and out
of this country. Oprah Winfrey has done the same, to name
just a few. But no one told them they HAD to. No one
forcibly took that money (other than the Millions in taxes
they already forfeit to the government). Instead, their
hearts were motivated to do so and this is the crux of the
matter. Free citizens do not need their Government to tell
them how to spend their money. Free citizens do not need
their Government encroaching on their very lively hoods. And
MOST IMPORTANTLY Free Citizens can certainly spend
their money better than the Federal Government. Why? Because
they have a vested interest in where that money goes due to
the fact that they have EARNED it!
By the way, those that believe that we
have a moral obligation to provide everyone with "free"
health care, and feel compelled to do make sure that
happens, should VOLUNTARILY pay more taxes for such
programs. Those that do not, should not be forced to do so.
This is the definition of a free society.
I
have been an
insurance broker in the state of
Illinois for the past 15 years and I
have seen first hand what happens
when an over burdened, tax funded,
Government controlled, entitlement
program like Medicaid is offered to
those with incomes well into the
middle class.
Last year, SCHIP
covered about 7 million low-income
children and Medicaid covered an
additional 23 million. This year,
2009, the U.S House of
Representatives passed the H.R.2
SCHIP Expansion Bill which adds
another 6.5 million children to
Medicaid.
In fact, according to U.S. Census
Bureau data, 42 million
children will now be eligible.
The bill also allows States
to receive federal reimbursement for
adding more immigrant children and
pregnant immigrant mothers, and
removes the 5 year waiting period
now required for legal immigrants to
be eligible. This
would enable immigrants to become
eligible for health benefits the
moment they get here.
Currently,
the present income
eligibility cap is $44,000 for a
family of 4. The new bill raised the
Medicaid limit to $66,000.
New York will even include families
who earn $88,000 and other states
allow families to subtract from
their income calculation what they
spend on rent or mortgage or heating
or food or transportation. This
means that children in some
families who have incomes well over
$100,000 will now be eligible.
With the median U.S. household
income around $50,000, 60% of U.S.
households still earning less than
$62,000. This means that 3
out of 5 American households will
now qualify for
free health care for their
children.It also
means that the other 2 out of
5 household will have the burden of
paying for all of this!
Let's take a look to see how some of
these programs are doing. Click
here
to read about
the Medicaid "expansion"
program enacted in my home State,
Illinois, by our recently impeached
and now infamous Democratic Governor
Rod Blagojevich.
In fact, Blago was so "generous"
that he expanded these Medicaid
entitlement programs to include a
defunct
"All
Kids Covered"plan,
a defunct
"Mom's
& Babies"
plan
and an equally defunct
"Family Care" plan.
These entitlement programs were
designed to provide FREE
health insurance coverage to all low
income women who are currently
pregnant (Mom's & Babies)
and
all children - here legally
or ILLEGALLY (All Kids Covered)
but they
were also to provide FREE
health insurance to all low income
mothers of children who are insured
under the "All Kids Covered" program
(Family Care).
Now, one does not need to study
actuarial science to quickly
conclude that these types of
entitlement expansion programs
simply can not continue to work
without massive and endless influxes
of tax payer dollars. In
fact, the State of Illinois is
currently $1.5 Billion (yes, that's
BILLION)
behind in payment of claims to
medical practitioners
who have already provided treatment
to program recipients. Furthermore,
submitted claims by unpaid
practitioners have accrued a
potential liability of
$81 million in interest due to
payment delays over the past 8
years.Read more
about the problems with claims
payments
here.
Update: As of
January 2009 a
moratorium has been placed on the
sliding scale portion of the
Illinois Family Care and the
Mom's & Babies program. One
can only wonder why. Could
it be due to lack of funding?
Illinois had been lauded as the
"Flagship"
state for all others to follow
regarding the expansion of the
Medicaid entitlement programs. If
this is the template for all others
to follow, then god help us all, or
at least those of us that actually
fund the Medicaid system through our
hard earned tax dollars.
Weighty decisions such as expanding
the Medicaid system to virtually "All Kids"
regardless of their actual need,
simply can not be made based
entirely on emotion!
Prudent decision makers must weigh
the desire to help all mankind
against fiscal REALITY.
There simply is not enough money to
provide such irresponsible
expansions of the Medicaid program.
This is the real reason why
President Bush
vetoed
the SCHIP program
after the $780,000,000,000 (BILLION)
"Porkulus Maximus" Bailout Bill
passed in the Senate which was
pushed hard by the Democratic Party.
Of course, despite the caution of
conservatives in the Republican
party, the SCHIP bill did pass both
the House and
Senate in 2009.
But how can we afford to pay for
such entitlement programs? Should we
limit these programs to those that
truly cannot afford to purchase
individual health insurance on the
open market? How will we determine
who is deserving of
such entitlements (e.g.
legal residents of this country who
actually qualify during a legitimate
needs assessment.)
What about personal responsibility?
Should we also pay for the
middle class if they can afford to
purchase health insurance on their
own?
Expansion of these entitlement
programs to the
middle class may be
well meaning, but it is undoubtedly
a fiscally irresponsible act
that will end up crippling
the already over burdened system.
We might not feel the direct impact
of this now, but we most certainly
will when all of the
"Baby Boomers" start
entering the Assisted
Living and Long Term Care
arena. Should we just let Boomers
who don't have the forethought to
purchase Long Term Care insurance
off of the financial hook while
taxpayers shoulder the burden?
Today, those of us who are in need
of health insurance have
many options
to choose from and, contrary to
popular belief many of these
options are priced very affordably.
An integral part of being personally
responsible is that you take the
time to explore ALL of your options
so you can fiscally sound decisions
BEFORE leaning on a an already over
burdened Medicaid system.
If you have other options, you
should never leave any decisions up
government bureaucrats, especially
your healthcare.
Health Insurance Tips & Advice
For The Self Employed & Small
Business Owner
I have been a health insurance
broker for 15 years now and every
day I read more and more "horror"
stories that are posted on the
Internet regarding health insurance
companies not paying claims,
refusing to cover specific illnesses
and physicians not getting
reimbursed for medical services.
Unfortunately, insurance companies
are driven by profits, not people
(albeit they need people to make
profits). If the insurance company
can find a legal reason not to pay a
claim, chances are they will find
it, and you the consumer will
suffer.
However, what most people fail to realize is that there are very few
"loopholes" in an insurance policy that give the insurance company an unfair
advantage over the consumer. In fact, insurance companies go to great
lengths to detail the limitations of their coverage by giving the policy
holders 10-days (a 10-day free look period) to review their policy.
Unfortunately, most people put their insurance cards in their wallet and
place their policy in a drawer or filing cabinet during their 10-day free
look and it usually isn't until they receive a "denial" letter from the
insurance company that they take their policy out to really read through
it. The majority of people, who buy their own health insurance, rely heavily
on the insurance agent selling the policy to explain the plan's coverage and
benefits. This being the case, many individuals who purchase their own
health insurance plan can tell you very little about their plan, other than,
what they pay in premiums and how much they have to pay to satisfy their
deductible.
Excellent Health Insurance Advice from Dateline NBC
Excellent Health Insurance Advice from Doctor Jennifer Ashton on the
CBS Morning Show 4/9/09
For many consumers, purchasing a health insurance policy on their own can be
an enormous undertaking. Purchasing a health insurance policy is not like
buying a car, in that, the buyer knows that the engine and transmission are
standard, and that power windows are optional. A health insurance plan is
much more ambiguous, and it is often very difficult for the consumer to
determine what type of coverage is standard and what other benefits are
optional. In my opinion, this is the primary reason that most policy holders
don't realize that they do not have coverage for a specific medical
treatment until they receive a large bill from the hospital stating that
"benefits were denied." Sure, we all complain about insurance companies, but
we do know that they serve a "necessary evil."
There
are so many variables that consumers
have to be aware of when it comes to
buying health insurance. These
variables, and confusing insurance
terminology, are often difficult for
the average consumer to understand
which is why many small business
owners actually put off looking for
a new health plan until their rates
have skyrocketed to the point that
they can no longer afford the
monthly premiums. Business owners,
who find themselves in this
position, often place a greater
emphasis on how much the new plan
will cost, rather than placing an
emphasis on what benefits the new
plan will actually offer.
Quite often, consumers that base
their purchasing decision entirely on price, don't even realize that their
new plan may not provide coverage for specific medical conditions or that
the amount allotted for certain treatments may be extremely limited. And, it
usually isn't until they receive a large bill from a medical provider which
states that "claims were denied" that they realize thatthey made a critical mistake in plan selection.
As a small business owner, myself,
who primarily deals with other small business owners, I have come to the
realization that part of the problem is that it is extremely difficult for
individuals purchasing their health plan on the open market to distinguish
the difference among health plans. It is also equally difficult for
consumers to determine what type of health insurance coverage they actually
need for their particular situation.
Remember, there is a big difference
between the type of health plan consumers actually "need" and the type of
health plan consumers actually "want." Let me explain.
Recently, I have read many blog
articles that seem to stress that consumers should purchase health plans
that offer 100% coverage with a very low deductible. 100% coverage means
that after the deductible is met, usually $250, the plan will pay 100% of
all covered medical expenses.
Although I agree that these types
of health plans have a great "curb appeal." I can
tell you from personal experience that these plans are not for everyone, nor
are they affordable.
Will a low deductible plan that
offers 100% coverage offer the policy holder greater peace of mind?
Probably. But is a low deductible health plan that offers 100% health
insurance coverage something that most consumers really need? Probably not.
In my professional opinion,
consumers must achieve a balance between four important variables;
wants, needs, risk
and cost when they purchase a health plan. Just like the
car analogy, it is important for healthcare consumers to understand what
type of health insurance benefits are automatically included or standard and
which health insurance benefits are optional. For example, on most health
plans, maternity and prescription drug coverage is optional.
With this in mind, if one is
healthy, takes no medications and rarely goes to the doctor, do they really
need a 100% plan with a $5 co-payment for prescription drugs if it costs
them $300 dollars more a month?
Would it benefit a person to pay
$200 more a month to have a 90/10 plan with a $250 deductible, or should
they purchase an 80/20 plan with a $2,500 deductible which allows them to
save $200 a month? Wouldn't the 80/20 plan still offer you adequate
coverage? Isn't it more cost effective to put that extra $200 that would be
spent on insurance premiums, totaling $2,400 per year in their bank account,
"just in case" they may get sick or injured and might need to
pay their $2,000 deductible?
Isn't it smarterto keep your hard-earned money
yourself, rather than pay higher monthly premiums to an insurance company
for an illness or injury that may never happen?
This is just one example of
consumer-driven health care. Another example is an HSA
qualified HPHP.
A HSA
qualified HDHP
(Health Savings Account qualified High Deductible Health Plan) may offer a
more affordable healthcare option to individuals that are searching for a
health plan with very low monthly premiums. Typically, these plans offer
policyholders greater flexibility and control in where their health care
dollars are spent. Plans often come with a fixed aggregate family
deductible, which mean that a separate deductible does not have to be met
for each family member on the plan.
In addition to the significant cost
savings, policyholders can fund their Health Savings Account (HSA) to pay
for routine medical expenses or alternative medical therapies, like
acupuncture. Any money in the HSA that is not used for medical
expenses can be rolled over to the next year and excess funds can be
transferred to a tax deductible, tax deferred, interest bearing account,
commonly referred to as a "Medical IRA." These types of health plans can
offer tremendous tax advantages to policyholders. Not only can policyholders
save money on their health insurance premiums, but they also can use this
savings to build a nest egg for retirement. Many HSA administrators now
offer thousands of no load mutual funds to transfer your HSA funds into so
you can potentially earn an even higher rate of interest.
For more information on HSA
qualified HDHPs, click
here.
In my experience, I believe
that individuals who purchase their health plan based on "wants" rather than
"needs" feel the most defrauded or "ripped-off" by their insurance company
and/or insurance agent.
In fact, I hear almost identical
comments from
almost every business owner
that I speak to about health insurance.
Comments, such as:
"I have to run my
business; I don't have time to be sick!"
"I think I have gone to
the doctor 2 times in the last 5 years" .......and
"My insurance company
keeps raising my rates and I don't even use my insurance!"
Again, as a small business owner
myself, I can understand the frustration that many small business owners
express. So, here is the $64,000 question:
Q. Is there a simple
formula that everyone can follow to make health insurance buying easier?
A. YES. Become an INFORMED
insurance consumer!
If you are wondering what I mean by
this, let me explain:
Every time I contact a prospective
client or call one of my client referrals, I ask that person a list of
questions about their current health insurance policy. You know, that policy
that is in their dresser drawer or filing cabinet.
That same policy that they bought
to protect themselves and their family from that "worse case
scenario"
so they wouldn't have to file bankruptcy or lose their home due to unpaid
medical debt.
That policy that they thought
promised coverage for that $500,000 life-saving organ transplant, for the 40
chemotherapy treatments that they may have to undergo if they were diagnosed
with cancer or the many months of physical and/or speech therapy that they
might need to fully recover from a stroke.
Q. So, what do you think
happens almost 100% of the time when I ask these individuals "BASIC"
questions about their health insurance policy?
A. They almost always do
not know the answers!
The following is a list of
10 Questions that I routinely ask a prospective health insurance client.
1.
What Insurance Company are you insured with and what is the name of your
health insurance plan? For example, Blue Cross Blue
Shield-"Basic Blue."
2.
What is your Calendar Year Deductible and would you have to pay a
separate deductible for each family member if everyone in your family
became ill at the same time? For example, the majority of
health plans have a per person yearly deductible, for
example, $250, $500, $1,000, or $2,500. However, some plans will
only require you to pay a 2 person maximum deductible each year,
even if everyone in your family needs extensive medical care.
3. What is your
Coinsurance percentage and what dollar amount (stop loss number) is it
based on? For example, a good plan design works this way. After
you have satisfied your calendar year deductible, the insurance company
will pay 80% ($8,000) and you will pay 20% ($2,000) of the first $10,000
in medical bills that you incur each year. This first $10,000 is termed
the "stop loss number." After this brief sharing arrangement is
over, the insurance company pays 100% up to the Maximum Lifetime
Benefit, which is typically, $2-5 Million per insured for the rest of
that calendar year. Then, everything starts over again on the first day
of each subsequent calendar year. Stop loss numbers can be as little as
$5,000 or $10,000 or as much as $20,000. However, be aware that there
are some policies on the market that have NO stop loss number at all!
Therefore, it is critical that you ask what your stop loss number is
before you purchase a plan.
4. What is your
Maximum Out of Pocket Expense per year? Keep in mind that the
Maximum Out of Pocket Expenses per year includes all deductibles plus
all coinsurance percentages plus all applicable access fees, service
deductibles or other fees.
5. What is the
Lifetime Maximum Benefit the insurance company will pay if you or
someone in your family becomes seriously ill and does your health plan
have any "per illness" maximums or caps? For example, some
plans may have a $5 Million Lifetime Maximum, but there might be a
benefit cap of $100,000 per illness. This means that you would have to
develop many separate and unrelated life-threatening illnesses costing
$100,000 or less to qualify for the $5 Million of Lifetime Coverage.
6. Is your plan
a Schedule Plan, in that it only pays a certain amount for a specific
list of procedures?
For example, Mega Life & Health & Midwest National Life, endorsed by the
National Association of the Self-Employed, (N.A.S.E.) endorses schedule
plans under the name "Health Markets."
7. Does your
plan have Doctor Copays and are you limited to a certain number of
doctor co-pay visits per year?
For example, many plans have a limit of how many times you go to the
doctor per year for a copay and, quite often the limit is
2-4 visits.
8. Does your
plan offer Prescription Drug Coverage and if it does, do you pay a
co-pay for your prescriptions or do you have to meet a separate drug
deductible before you receive any benefits and/or do you just have a
discount prescription card only? For example, some plans offer
you prescription drug benefits right away, while other plans require
that you pay a separate drug deductible before you can receive
prescription medication for a copay. Today, many plans offer no copay
options and only provide you with a discount prescription card that only
gives you a 10-20% discount on all prescription medications. This is a
dangerous policy design that can lead to catastrophic out of pocket
expenses if you were to contract any one of a host of major medical
conditions such as, Multiple Sclerosis or Rheumatoid Arthritis that
require expensive outpatient maintenance medications which are usually
not available in Generic form.
9. Does your
plan have any reduction in benefits for Organ Transplants and if so,
what is the maximum your plan will pay if you need an organ transplant?
For example, some plans only pay a $100,000 maximum benefit for organ
transplants for a procedure that actually costs as much as $500K or
more. In addition, this $100,000 maximum may also include the cost of
expensive anti-rejection medications that have to be taken after a
transplant. If this is the case, the insured will often have to pay for
all anti-rejection medications (a.k.a. Immunosuppressants) out of
pocket. Keep in mind that these medications are among the most expensive
medications which individuals requiring an organ transplant will have to
take for the rest of their life.
10. Do you have
to pay a Separate Deductible or Access Fee for each hospital admission
or for each emergency room visit? For example, some plans, like
the Assurant Health's "CoreMed" plan have a separate $750 hospital
admission fee that you pay for the first 3 days you are in the hospital.
This fee is in addition to your plan deductible. Keep in mind that many
plans have benefit
"caps" or
"access fees" for out-patient services, such as, physical therapy,
speech therapy, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, etc. Benefit "caps"
could be as little as $500 for each out-patient treatment, leaving you a
bill for the remaining balance if the fee for that particular service
exceeds $500. "Access fees" are also additional fees that you
are required to pay per treatment. For example, for each outpatient
chemotherapy treatment, you may be required to pay a $250 "access
fee"per treatment. So for 40
chemotherapy treatments, you would have to pay 40 x $250 = $10,000.
Again,
these fees would be charged in
addition to your plan deductible.
Now that you have read the
list of questions that I ask a prospective health insurance client, ask
yourself. How many questions you were able to answer?
If you were not able to answer all
ten, don't be discouraged. That does not necessarily mean that you are not a
smart consumer. I am sure you comparison shop for everything else. Maybe you
were just extremely confused by all of the insurance terminology or you had
a "bad" insurance agent who did not take the time to
really explain the type of coverage you were purchasing.
So how would you know if you dealt
with a "bad"
insurance agent? Because a "great" insurance agent
would have taken the time to help you really understand your insurance
benefits and s/he would have answered all of your questions about your
health plan purchase BEFORE you signed on the dotted line.
Remember, insurance agents are not
different from any other professional. There are "great"
insurance agents and brokers that care about clients and offer exceptional
customer service, and then there are "bad" agents
that avoid answering questions and typically don't return phone calls when
clients leave messages about unpaid claims or skyrocketing health insurance
premiums.
Q. How do you know if you have a "great" agent?
A. A "great" agent
will recommend a health insurance plan based on all four variables; wants,
needs, risk and cost. A "great" agent gives you enough information
to weigh all of your options so
you can make an informed purchasing decision. And, lastly, a
"great" agent looks out for YOUR best interest and NOT the best
interest of the insurance company.
Another way to tell whether or not
you have a "great" or a "bad" insurance
agent is to determine how
many of the ten questions you were actually able to answer without looking
at your health insurance policy.
If you were able to answer all ten questions, you have a "great"
insurance agent.
If you were able to answer at least
seven out of ten questions, you probably have a "good"
insurance agent. But, if you were only able to answer a few questions or
less than seven out of the ten, you most likely have a "bad"
insurance agent.
Always keep in mind that your
health insurance purchase is just as important as purchasing a house or a
car, if not more important. So don't be afraid to ask your insurance agent a
lot of questions to make sure that you understand what your health plan does
and,
more importantly,
does not cover.
If you don't feel comfortable with the type of coverage that your insurance
agent suggests or if you think the price for the plan is too high, ask your
agent if s/he can select a comparable plan so you can make a side by side
comparison before you make a purchase.
And, always make sure that you read
all of the
"fine print" in your health plan brochure and please
remember to take the time to read through your policy during your
"10-day free look period."
Remember, if you don't understand
something, or aren't quite sure what the asterisk (*) next to the benefit
description really means in terms of coverage, call your insurance agent or
contact the insurance company directly to ask for further
clarification. Furthermore, make sure you take the time to perform your own
research on the Internet.
For example, if you research
Mega Life and Health
and
Midwest National Life Insurance Company,
endorsed by the National Association for the Self Employed (NASE),
you will find out that there have been
multiple class action lawsuits
brought against these companies since 1995. Many health insurance
companies, especially the ones that have to pay huge insurance fines often
change their name and target more unsuspecting consumers. In fact, today
these companies are selling health insurance under the name "Health
Markets."
So please perform your own due
diligence and ask yourself, "Is this a company that I can trust to
pay my health insurance claims?"
Additionally, find out if your
agent is a "captive" insurance agent or an insurance
"broker."
Why?
"Captive"
insurance agents can only offer ONE insurance company's products. In
contrast, an "Independent" agent or insurance "Broker"
can offer you a variety of different insurance plans from many different
quality carriers.
Over the years, I have developed
strong and trusting relationships with my clients and I am constantly
developing new clients through existing client referrals. This
is partly because of my level of insurance expertise and primarily due to
the level of personal service that I provide.
Because personal service is extremely critical to building long-term client
relationships, this is the main reason that I caution people to be very
careful when using online quoting engines and online applications to buy
health insurance on the Internet.
Again, in my professional opinion,
there are too many variables to consider when shopping for health insurance.
Therefore, I am a firm believer that a health insurance purchase requires
the level of expertise and personal attention that only an insurance
professional can provide. And, since it does not cost a penny more to
purchase your health insurance through an independent agent or broker, my
advice to you would be to use Ebay and Amazon for your less important
purchases and to use a knowledgeable, ethical and reputable independent
agent or broker for one of the most important purchases you will ever
make....your health insurance policy.
Lastly, if you have any concerns
about an insurance company, contact your state's Department of Insurance
BEFORE you buy your policy. Your state's Department of Insurance can tell
you if the insurance company is registered in your state and can also tell
you if there have been any complaints against that company that have been
filed by policyholders.
Also, if you suspect that your agent is trying to sell you a fraudulent
insurance policy, for example, you have to become a member of a union to
qualify for coverage, or s/he isn't being honest with you, your state's
Department of Insurance can also check to see if your agent is licensed and
whether or not there has ever been any disciplinary action previously taken
against that agent.
In closing, I hope I have given you
enough information so you can become an INFORMED insurance consumer and you
can understand why"The
Best Policy Is A Great Agent."
Whatever decision you make in regards to your health insurance, please
always remember to heed the following words of wisdom.
"If it sounds too good
to be true, it probably is!" ..........and
"If you only buy on
price, you get what you pay for!"
What Do Women
Really Want? Watch The Video Below
To Find Out.
Ten Questions You
Should Ask Your Agent Before You Buy A Policy
If you are a business owner, self-employed or an employee
of a company that is not offered medical coverage through your employer, you may
have to undertake the frustrating, daunting and time consuming task of
purchasing health insurance on your own. If this is the case, there are certain
things that you can do become an informed consumer so you can ensure that you
are purchasing the type of health insurance coverage you really need
at a price
you can afford.
When you purchase a health
insurance plan, it is important that you balance four important
variables: wants, needs, riskand cost,
before you spend your
money.
Although you may "want"a health plan that offers you 100% coverage and a $5 Copay for
prescription medications, you may not "need"this type of health plan if you are healthy, take no medications and do
not have any significant health related "risk"
factors.
Since a 100% health plan will
"cost"significantly more than an 80/20
Plan, it may not be in your best interest to pay higher monthly premiums for
100% coverage if you are currently healthy.
Although no one knows exactly when
they will actually use their insurance coverage, considering these four key
variables prior to purchasing a health plan is a good rule of thumb.
It is also critical for health
insurance consumers to understand that all plans, even 100% Plans, have some
form of coverage limitations. Knowing what your policy DOES NOT cover, is
more important than knowing what it DOES cover.
Many plans also have a separate
deductible for emergency room visits. These deductibles are in place to
discourage policyholders from using the emergency room as a doctor's office.
Typically, these ER deductibles are waived if the patient is admitted to the
hospital.
The following is a list of
10 key questions that
should help health insurance consumers to better understand the coverage
limitations of the plans they are considering purchasing. Make sure you ask
your insurance agent these questions BEFORE purchasing a health insurance
policy.
1.
What insurance company do you represent and are you a "captive" agent,
"independent" agent or an insurance "broker?" "Captive" agents
represent ONE insurance company's products only.
An "independent" agent or insurance
"broker," on the other hand, typically represent many quality insurance carriers
and can sell a variety of different insurance products without any contractual
restrictions.
BEWARE!
Dealing with a "captive" agent may limit your choices, since these agents
can only sell that particular insurance company's health plans.
2.
What is the plan's calendar year Deductible and would I have to pay a
separate deductible for each family member if everyone in my family
became ill at the same time? The majority of health plans have
a per person calendar year deductible, for
example, $250, $500, $1,000, or $2,500. Some plans are designed so in a
"worse case scenario" only two family members will have to
pay their deductible in any given calendar year.
BEWARE!Some plans will require each person in the
family to pay their calendar year deductible. This can be a huge financial
burden if everyone in the family was involved in an accident or if members
of the family became ill at the same time. Many
plans have a separate drug deductible before the plan will pay for any
medications. Make sure you know what deductibles you will be responsible for
before you buy a health plan.
3.
What is the plan's Coinsurance percentage and what Stop Loss Number is
this percentage based on?
These percentages are typically
based on a specific dollar amount, known as the "stop loss number."
Here's where it get's tricky. Quite often, health insurance plans have
different "stop loss numbers".
I have seen some plans that have a "stop loss number"
as low as $2,000 and as high as $25,000 or some with none at all.
Let's figure out the
insured's maximum out of pocket on an 80/20 plan that has a $1,000
deductible and an 80/20 split of the first $5,000 ("stop loss number.")
$1,000 + 20% of $5,000
($1,000) = A Maximum Out of Pocket of $2,000.
Now, let's figure out the
insured's maximum out of pocket on an 80/20 plan that has a $250 deductible
and a $10,000 "stop loss number."
$250 + 20% of $10,000
($2000) = A Maximum Out of Pocket of $2,250. (Note: Total does not include
any separate "service deductibles" or access fees. Many low quality plans
also have these.)
Again, after this brief 80/20 cost
sharing with the insurance company, also know as a the coinsurance
percentage split, most major medical plans will pay 100% of in-network
covered charges up to the Lifetime Maximum amount that is specified in the
policy.
BEWARE!
Some policies on the market are sold with
NO stop loss, but still
list a coinsurance percentage. Therefore if you purchase an 80/20 with no
stop loss, you will actually be paying 20% of all of your medical bills each
calendar year. So unless you want to be responsible for 20% of all of your
bills, make sure you find out what the "stop loss number" is BEFORE you
purchase a health plan!
4.
What is the plan's Maximum Out Of Pocket Expenses per year?
This expense is a total of all deductibles, plus all coinsurance
percentages, plus all applicable "access fees",
"service deductibles" or other "fees" outlined in your policy.
BEWARE!
Quite often agents neglect to tell prospects about hidden fees, so make sure
you have a good grasp on the basics, like deductibles, coinsurance & stop
loss numbers. Always ask about additional "fees" BEFORE you purchase the
plan!
5. What is the plan's
Lifetime Maximum Benefit if I become seriously ill and does the plan
have any "per illness" maximums or caps? The majority of health
insurance plans have a two million or five million dollar Lifetime
Maximum Benefit. The Lifetime Maximum Benefit is the maximum
amount the insurance company will pay if you or someone in your family
becomes seriously ill.
BEWARE!
Some policies will stipulate that there is a maximum benefit cap of $100,000
per illness. This means that you would have to develop many separate and
unrelated life-threatening
illnesses costing $100,000 or less to qualify for the five million dollar
Lifetime Maximum Benefit.
Mega Life & Health, Midwest National Life a.k.a.
Health Markets, formerly U.I.C.I., endorsed and promoted by the
National Association for the Self Employed (N.A.S.E) and the Alliance for
Affordable Services are known for selling "schedule" plans with "per illness
caps."
6.
Is the plan a Schedule Plan, in that it only pays a certain amount for a
specific list of procedures? Some health plans only pay a
specific dollar amount for certain procedures, despite the fact that the
procedure often cost more than the plan stimulates.
BEWARE!
Mega Life & Health, Midwest National Life a.k.a. Health Markets, formerly
U.I.C.I., endorsed and promoted by the National Association for the Self
Employed (NASE) and the Alliance for Affordable Services are known for
selling "schedule" plans.
7.
Does the plan have unlimited doctor copays or is there a limited number
of doctor copay visits allowed each year? Many quality plans
have no limit on the number of times you can use your doctor copay.
BEWARE!
Several plans have a limit of how many times you can go to the doctor each
year for a Copay. Quite often, the limit is 2-4 visits per year.
8.
Does the plan offer Prescription Drug Coverage and if it does, what type
of coverage? Some plans offer prescription drug benefits on
both generic and brand name medications right away. Other plans will
require you to pay a separate outpatient prescription drug
deductiblebeforeyou can
obtain your prescription medication for a Copay.
BEWARE!
Today, many plans offer NO outpatient prescription drug Copay options.
Typically, these plans only provide the insured with a discount prescription
card which only offers the insured a 10-20% discount on prescription
medications. This can lead to catastrophic out of pocket expenses to the
insured.
9.
Does the plan have any reduction in benefits for Organ Transplants and
if so, what is the maximum the plan will pay out for an organ
transplant?
The majority of quality major medical plans treat organ transplants as
any other illness. This means that the insurance company will cover the
insured until the Lifetime Maximum Benefit of the plan is reached.
Again, in most cases, this Lifetime Maximum is five million dollars. You
should accept no less than one million dollars of coverage for Organ
Transplants.
BEWARE!
Today, some plans only pay a $100,000 maximum benefit
for organ transplants. Plans that offer limited organ transplant coverage
are extremely risky, since organ transplant procedures often range in the
neighborhood of $350-$500K. In addition, it is not uncommon for a transplant
patient to need a second organ transplant. Keep in mind, that the $100,000
maximum payment for organ transplants on many plans also includes the cost
of expensive anti-rejection medications. If you have an organ transplant,
you will quickly reach the $100,000 maximum benefit, which means that you
will be required to pay for costly anti-rejection medication out of pocket.
This can lead to catastrophic out of pocket costs to the insured.
10.
Does the plan have any separate "services deductibles" or "access fee"
for each hospital admission or for each outpatient test? Some
plans, like Assurant Health's "CoreMed" plan have a separate $750
hospital admission fee for the first three days of each hospital stay.
These hospital admission fees may also be called "Access Fees" on other
policies. Typically the insured is responsible for paying these access
fees for each hospital admission in addition to their calendar year
health plan deductible.
BEWARE!
"Access fees" and "service deductibles" are separate from your plan's
calendar year health plan deductible.
Be aware that many plans now have benefit "caps" or "access fees"
for out-patient services, such as, physical therapy, speech therapy,
chemotherapy, radiation therapy, etc. These "benefit caps" could be as
little as $500 for each out-patient treatment, which will leave the insured
responsible for the remaining balance that is over $500.
Again, "access fees"
are additional fees that you may have to pay per treatment before the
insurance company will pay the provider. These fees can quickly add up. For
example, if you need to have 40 outpatient chemotherapy treatments, and you
must pay a $250 "access fee" per treatment, you would have to pay an
additional 40 x $250 = $10,000.
Remember, purchasing a health plan
is the most important purchase you will ever make. Insist that your
insurance agent explain to you exactly what your health plan does and does
not cover and take the time to read the "fine print"
in the plan brochure and ask questions about terminology you don't
completely understand.
In addition, when you receive your
health insurance policy in the mail, don't just detach your insurance cards
and place them in your wallet or purse and then throw your insurance policy
in your desk drawer or filing cabinet. Take the time to sit down and read
your policy page by page.
Once you receive your policy, you
have a 10-day free look period, so if your coverage is not
what you thought you purchased, you have time to call the insurance company
and cancel the policy without incurring any fees.
Finally, if your being pitched a
health plan that seems to good to be true (e.g. all pre existing conditions
are covered, the plan is significantly cheaper than all other plans) contact
your state's Department of Insurance BEFORE you buy the policy. Your state's
Department of Insurance can tell you if the insurance company is registered
in your state and can also tell you if there have been any complaints
against that company that have been filed by policyholders.
Remember, if you suspect that your
being scammed or you think the agent is trying to sell you a fraudulent
insurance policy, (e.g. you have to become a member of a union to qualify
for coverage) your state's Department of Insurance can also check to see if
any prior disciplinary action has been previously taken against that agent.
Don’t Fall Victim To
Health Insurance Scams: 10 “Red Flags” You Should Watch Out For
In today's fast
paced world, business owners don't often have the time to thoroughly check out
the companies they rely on to provide goods and services. In many cases, a
determination of product/service quality can be made at the time goods are
delivered or services are rendered. If goods or services do not meet
expectations, there is often an immediate remedy available. For example,
poor quality goods can be shipped back to the supplier and/or payment for
services can be withheld until services are satisfactorily rendered.
Unfortunately,
business owners do not always purchase items that are tangible items, in the
sense that they can immediately determine the quality of the goods and/or
services at the time of purchase. One example of such a purchase is health
insurance. Since health insurance is not usually used immediately after
purchase, the quality of care or the legitimacy of the policy may not even come
into play until the business owner, or a family member, actually needs to have
medical treatment. This is one of the primary reasons that many companies, often
appearing legitimate, can get away with selling bogus health insurance coverage
to unsuspecting business owners.
In most cases,
fraudulent health insurance policies are sold to business owners by
telemarketers or "agents" through bogus Associations and Unions. In that, the
buyer must join a professional and/or trade association or become a union member
to qualify for health insurance. In fact, in a study published by the U.S.
General Accountability Office (GAO) in 2004, the GAO found that association
schemes ranked at the top of the marketing methods followed by bogus health
insurers. According to the report, "Employers and Individuals Are Vulnerable to
Unauthorized or Bogus Entities Selling Coverage, between 2000 and 2002, the U.S.
Department of Labor and state insurance regulators identified 144 unauthorized
entities selling health insurance unlawfully. These entities defrauded 15,000
employers and more than 200,000 policyholders out of $252 million."
However, it is
important to mention that many individual and group health insurance products
are endorsed by reputable Associations, such as the AARP and the American Bar
Association and, many reputable Unions, such as the AFL-CIO and the Teamsters.
These organizations have long been recognized for bringing a common class of
professionals or citizens together for other purposes that have very little to
do with health insurance. Membership commonly includes a wide range of other
benefits in addition to discounted health insurance. Typically, the
organizations have a governing organization, a constitution and bylaws, a set of
officers, voting rights, regular membership meetings and a professional code of
conduct.
Unfortunately, most
individuals do not find out that they were making hefty monthly payments or
premiums to fraudulent Associations or Unions until they have a severe condition
that requires medical treatment. Usually, it isn't until after they receive
treatment that they receive notice from their medical provider that the claim
that was submitted to the insurance company was denied and that all the medical
charges that were incurred are now their responsibility.
Often, the scheme
starts when business owners are contacted by telephone or approached by someone
who claims to represent a certain, official sounding, Association or Union. The
business owner is then informed that if s/he becomes a member of the Association
or joins the Union, s/he could qualify for a low cost group or individual health
insurance plan. Typically the Association or Union is promoted to represent
self-employed individuals and small business owners. The low cost health
insurance is usually presented as one of the many "perks" that the business
owner can qualify for, in addition to many other "member" benefits, like
discounts on other services, such as dental, eyeglasses, office
supplies, hotels, rental cars, etc.
In many instances,
these bogus companies involve licensed health insurance agents to sell their
fraudulent health insurance products. Sometimes the "agents" know the products
are fraudulent, other times, the "agent" also falls prey to the scheme.
Often, the schemes prey upon consumers who have been previously declined
insurance coverage or suffer from a pre-existing condition. Since these
consumers have very limited options to purchase private health insurance
coverage, the benefits of an Association or Union membership that offers health
insurance coverage for a "membership fee" or "union due" is enticing. To the
unsuspecting consumer that has a pre-existing medical condition or is paying
high premiums for coverage, the "membership fee" or "union due" is a small price
to pay for what they believe will be a quality health plan that provides
"guaranteed" coverage with no "pre-existing condition exclusions" and no
"waiting periods."
In many
circumstances, the print materials that are left with the consumer are very well
designed, however, the majority of the time, the language in the "health plan
brochure," if there is one, is very unclear. The literature may name the entity
that is authorized to act as the health plan administrator of the plan, but
neglect to name the actual insurance company that is providing the health
insurance coverage. Unfortunately, it is often difficult for the consumer to
separate the illegitimate companies selling official sounding health plans from
the legitimate ones. Typically fraudulent health plans have many commonalities.
Here are 10 "Red
Flags" that may indicate health insurance fraud:
1.)
The "agent" is not a licensed
insurance agent but an "enrollment" or "membership" coordinator.
2.) The
term "discount plan" is written in the product literature, but the term
health plan, health insurance or policy is frequently used by the plan
promoter. Discount plans often provide nothing more than a discount for
medical services, such as prescription medications, eyeglasses, dental,
etc. These plans are not designed to offer major medical health
insurance coverage.
3.) The
official sounding "Association or Union" is one that you have never
heard of before.
4.) The
plan is referred to as an ERISA plan. The Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) is a federal law that allows employers to
set up employee benefit plans for employees and their dependents. ERISA
plans are not subject to state regulation and are not regulated by the
state insurance commissioner. ERISA plans are normally not sold as
health insurance, but are instead, established by employers, unions or
groups acting on behalf of employers. Therefore, unsuspecting
buyers believe these plans actually offer health insurance coverage,
when if fact, they do not.
5.) The
buyer is told that the "membership fee or union dues" includes the
health insurance premium, but there is no mention of the word "premium"
in any of the plan literature.
6.) The
plan offers "guaranteed" insurance coverage with no exclusions for
"pre-existing conditions" and no "waiting periods."
7.) The
plan is significantly cheaper in price than other health insurance
plans.
8.) The
term "reinsured" is used in regards to the plan. Reinsurance is
something insurance companies buy to protect themselves against their
own risks. It is insurance for insurance companies. Licensed insurers
rarely have their agents mention any of their reinsurance arrangements
during a sales presentation.
9.) The
Association or Union is comprised of members from all walks of life
and/or requires its members to state that they belong to a certain
trade, class or group of professionals that they have no affiliation
with, for example, the Association or Union is said to be comprised of
"Food and Beverage" workers, but "Florists" and "Machinists" are allowed
to enroll as members.
10.) If
the Association or Union is said to have a special arrangement with a
health insurance company, a plan administrator or another third party
that has designed the plan using a legal "loophole" that allows members
to purchase health insurance at a discounted rate or to purchase a
individual or group health insurance policy.
So how can you
protect yourself from falling victim to a fraudulent insurance scam? Make
sure you contact your state's department of Insurance to determine if the health
insurance company and the third-party administrator are licensed to do business
in your state and make sure that the "agent" selling the plan is a "licensed
health insurance agent." Additionally, make sure that health insurance
company has been approved to sell the particular policy that is being offered.
Since it may be difficult to tell if fraud is involved, always put off buying
your health insurance policy until you have had the opportunity to perform your
own due diligence.
If you are
not familiar with the new
"American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act Of 2009"
then you need to learn more
at the U.S. Department of Labor
web site. In a nutshell, this
new Federal Act entitles you to
a
65% reduction in your
monthly COBRA continuation
premium
if you lost your job
after September 1st,
2008. Granted it
only lasts for 9 months,
but it is most certainly going
to help millions of American's
who have lost their employer
sponsored group health insurance
coverage.
However,
there are
"strings attached,"
for those who earn more than
$125,000 or $250,000 for married
couples filing a joint federal
income tax return, in that, if
your income meets or exceeds
these amounts, you may have to
repay all or part of the premium
reduction. Therefore, if you
are in a higher income bracket,
you may wish to consider waiving
your right to the premium
reduction as it may increase
your income tax liability for
the year. For more information
on how higher income earners are
affected by this Act, please
refer to the March 25, 2009
Issue of
Forbes Magazine.
But, what
if you decide to elect COBRA?
The question then becomes, "What
do you do after the
nine month COBRA subsidy expires or when your COBRA
runs out altogether?" Kimberly
Langford at Kiplinger's Personal
Finance discusses:
Excellent Advice on what to do after
your Cobra subsidy ends
from Kimberly Lankford
at Kiplinger's Personal
Finance on CNBC May
16th, 2009
As Kimberly mentions,
there are several lower
cost alternatives to
paying high priced COBRA
continuation premiums.
Depending on what state you live
in, there may be other health
insurance options that you can
select when your 9 month subsidy
expires or when COBRA finally
runs out at the end of 18
months. They are as follows:
1. The
first option is
"State Continuation of Coverage." Many States offer
State Continuation of Coverage. While State Continuation of Coverage
does not follow Cobra continuation laws, it does allow you to continue
your employer sponsored group coverage for up to 9 months even if your
former employer employed less than 20 employees. This law does not apply
to self-funded plans, so make sure to check with your State's Department
of Insurance to see if your State mandates State Continuation of
Coverage.
2. The second option, an
"Individual Health Insurance Policy"
is typically the best and
most affordable alternative for relatively healthy individuals.
An individual health plan can be purchased at
any time and is a great way to maintain many of the same
kinds of benefits that you had through your former employer's sponsored
group health plan.
However, an Individual
Health Insurance policy has to be "underwritten" before it is
issued. During the "underwriting" process, the insurance company
scrutinizes the applicant's health history to determine if it will
extend an offer for insurance coverage. This process allows the
insurance company to "decline" coverage to applicants with serious
pre-existing or chronic medical conditions or to modify the coverage
it extends to the applicant.
Today, the
"Individual" health insurance market has become
quite competitive; therefore, many insurance carriers are willing to
offer health insurance coverage to individuals with certain
controlled pre-existing medical conditions, like high blood pressure
or high cholesterol.
Other times, the insurance
company will offer the applicant coverage, but will refuse to cover
a specific body part or pre-existing condition. In these cases, the
insurance company issues what is known as an "exclusion
rider." An exclusion rider
is a way for the insurance company to
exclude coverage for a
specific body part or a specific medical condition (e.g.
right knee, uterine fibroids). Exclusion riders can be permanent
(body part or condition excluded coverage for the life of policy) or
temporary, (body part or condition excluded coverage for a specific
period of time.)
Often, if an exclusion
rider is placed on a body part and the insured receives no further
treatment on that body part or if the rider is in place to exclude a
pre-existing medical condition and the insured's condition
completely resolves, the policyholder can request that the insurance
company remove the exclusion rider from the policy. Typically,
requests to remove a rider can be made after one or two years.
Ultimately, the insurance company will makes the final decision on
whether the exclusion rider will be removed.
An
HSA
qualified HDHP (Health
Savings Account qualified High Deductible Health Plan) may offer a
more affordable consumer-driven healthcare option to individuals
that are searching for a health plan with very low monthly premiums.
Typically, these plans offer policyholders greater flexibility and
control in where their health care dollars are spent. Plans often
come with a fixed aggregate family deductible, which mean that a
separate deductible does not have to be met for each family member
on the plan.
In addition to the
significant cost savings, policyholders can fund their Health
Savings Account (HSA) to pay for routine medical expenses or
alternative medical therapies, like acupuncture. Any money in
the HSA that is not used for medical expenses can be rolled over to
the next year and excess funds can be transferred to a tax
deductible, tax deferred, interest bearing account, commonly
referred to as a "Medical IRA." These types of health plans can
offer tremendous tax advantages to policyholders. Not only can
policyholders save money on their health insurance premiums, but
they also can use this savings to build a nest egg for retirement.
Many HSA administrators now offer thousands of no load mutual funds
to transfer your HSA funds into so you can potentially earn an even
higher rate of interest.
For more information on HSA
qualified HDHPs, click here.
3. The third option is a
"Small Group Health Insurance Plan." This type of
plan can be purchased immediately and might just be what the doctor
ordered for those individuals that that have been "declined" coverage
for an "Individual" health plan. It might also be another option for
individuals who are looking for coverage without an "exclusion rider" on
a pre-existing medical condition because group health insurance provides
"guaranteed insurability,"
which means that all applicants and their families will receive
health insurance coverage for all pre-existing medical conditions.
Because recent layoffs and
a tough job market have created opportunities for many professionals
thinking about starting their own business, here are a few things to
keep in mind when considering group health insurance coverage.
Typically, a company must have a minimum of two employees. Insurance
companies typically allow husband and wife to enroll separately so
the two-employee minimum can be met. The company must have a Federal
Tax ID number, which means that sole proprietors, will have to
incorporate, unless they have an existing business with a Federal
Tax ID. To qualify for a small group plan, at least two of the
employees on the plan must work a minimum of 30 hours per week and
must receive a wage for the 30 hours worked.
On a Small Group Health
Insurance plan, a large portion of the monthly premiums are
determined by the health status of those individuals participating
in the plan. Even if only one individual has a serious medical
condition, that individual's condition is likely to adversely affect
everyone's health insurance premiums. This means that even healthy
group participants will pay a higher monthly premium. It may also
mean that premiums can increase dramatically (up to 300% higher or
more depending on your State) if someone covered on the group plan
develops a serious condition or if an individual with a serious
medical condition is hired at a later date.
This is important to keep
in mind if your business is likely to grow, as your insurance
contract may require you to offer new employees health insurance
benefits and also require the corporation to pay a portion of your
employees health insurance premiums.
The main advantage of a
Small Group Health Insurance Plan is that it provides seamless
continuation of coverage for those individuals who have pre-existing
conditions such as Diabetes or Cancer providing that they have a
minimum of 18 months of
prior continuous health insurance coverage with no lapse in coverage
of more than 63 days.
4. The forth option is a
"State Insurance Risk Pool." This option
is primarily for individuals who have serious medical conditions and who
have been "declined" individual health insurance coverage. Many states,
but not all, provide individuals with pre-existing conditions the
opportunity to obtain seamless continuation of health insurance coverage
after their COBRA continuation expires, or if they lost their employer
sponsored group coverage due to a policy cancellation and they were
unable to obtain an individual health insurance policy on the open
market because of their pre-existing conditions.
State Insurance Risk Pools
often offer immediate coverage to individuals that would normally
render someone "uninsurable" on the
individual health insurance market. To qualify for a State Insurance
Risk Pool, applicants have to show "proof of credible
coverage" for a minimum of
18 months prior to
application, with no lapse in coverage of more than 63 days.
Although Risk Pool coverage is also available to those who have been
"declined" coverage on an Individual Health Insurance policy, there
is usually a 6 or 12 months waiting period before preexisting
conditions will be covered if the applicant fails to show "proof of
credible coverage." To find if your state has a State
High Risk Insurance Pool, click
here.