S.B.I.S.
     "The Best Policy Is A Great Agent"

 

        Small Business Insurance Services, Inc

               Quality Traditional & Tax Qualified Health Insurance

   

Home About Us Testimonials Health Insurance Health Blog Find Your Doctor F.A.Q. Contact Us

 

Share/Save/Bookmark

Consumer Reports Article 04/06/2009
"7 Signs A Health Plan Might Be Junk"

Beware Of Discount  "Health Plans"

Tips for finding Health Insurance when you've lost your job.

Guaranteed Issue Defined Benefit Health Insurance: Lots of Limitations!

Fed Allows 65% Cobra Premium Reduction For 9 Months! What Do You Do After the "Cobra Stimulus" Ends?

New Illinois Dependant Eligibility Law Extends coverage to your dependant child up to age 26 (or 30). They no longer need to be attending college.

Ten Questions To Ask Your Agent BEFORE You Buy Health Insurance

What The Heck Is Consumer Driven Health Insurance? Can It Really Save You Money AND Lower Your Taxes?

If You Purchased Health Insurance From Mega Life & Health or Midwest National Life Through The National Association For The Self Employed (NASE) You Need To Know The Truth!
 

Click Play To Listen To Our Current
Health Insurance Radio Commercial


 


Visit Conservative Business Owners (Twitter Hashtag #cbiz)

 United Healthcare Is Now Offering Insurance For Your Health Insurance?

 United Health Care now offers the "Continuity" plan. The "Continuity" plan is a concept enacted by the CEO of United Health Care &  its subsidiary Golden Rule Insurance company. The concept is a brilliant one indeed because one of the greatest challenges to  all health insurance brokers is the struggle to maintain "Guaranteed Insurability" for clients who have been diagnosed with a host of  conditions such as Diabetes or Cancer. The onset of either one of these illnesses (and many more) will render one "uninsurable" on  the individual major medical market. This can become a very serious problem if one looses their employer sponsored group  coverage and can not either afford their State's risk pool coverage, or they do not live in a State that provides a High Risk Pool
 
 The "Continuity" plan resolves this problem by allowing insurable consumers to purchase any plan that United Health Care/Golden rule  offers at only 20% of the normal required premium for that plan. Consumers can purchase this plan whilst they are covered by an  employer sponsored group health insurance plan that offers them Guaranteed Insurability. Whilst the consumer is still insured by their  employer sponsored group plan the United Health Care policy of their choice goes in to a "dormant" state. In other words, the policy  remains in force as long as the insured pays only 20% of the required monthly premium for that product.  

The moment that the consumer looses employer sponsored group coverage, or is faced with a hefty Cobra continuation premium. They can then elect to "awaken" the policy out of its "dormant" state and the policy will then begin to cover them on a Guaranteed Insurability basis without the need for underwriting. This means that if a consumer were to develop a major medical condition that would render them uninsurable on the individual major medical market whilst the "Continuity" plan was in its "dormant" state, their pre existing conditions would continue to be covered seamlessly from day one once the consumer elects to "awaken" their "Continuity" coverage. Once the policy is "awakened" the insured would now have to pay the entire monthly premium required to maintain that individual health insurance policy. But as anyone in the industry knows, individual policies often require a fraction of the premium that is required to maintain a Cobra continuation plan. 

Once the insured has retained another employer sponsored group plan that provides Guaranteed Insurability (presumably by securing another employment position) then the policy goes back in to its "dormant" state and the premium is subsequently reduced to only 20% or the required monthly premium. Essentially this concept allows any consumer to "float" in and out of employer sponsored group coverage whilst also maintaining the all important "Guaranteed Insurability" clause so valuable to those who have been rendered "uninsurable" on the individual major medical market. For more about this brilliant concept click here.

Health Insurance Tips & Advice For The Self Employed & Small Business Owner

I have been a health insurance broker for 15 years now and every day I read more and more "horror" stories that are posted on the Internet regarding health insurance companies not paying claims, refusing to cover specific illnesses and physicians not getting reimbursed for medical services. Unfortunately, insurance companies are driven by profits, not people (albeit they need people to make profits). If the insurance company can find a legal reason not to pay a claim, chances are they will find it, and you the consumer will suffer.

However, what most people fail to realize is that there are very few "loopholes" in an insurance policy that give the insurance company an unfair advantage over the consumer. In fact, insurance companies go to great lengths to detail the limitations of their coverage by giving the policy holders 10-days (a 10-day free look period) to review their policy. Unfortunately, most people put their insurance cards in their wallet and place their policy in a drawer or filing cabinet during their 10-day free look and it usually isn't until they receive a "denial" letter from the insurance company that they take their policy out to really read through it. The majority of people, who buy their own health insurance, rely heavily on the insurance agent selling the policy to explain the plan's coverage and benefits. This being the case, many individuals who purchase their own health insurance plan can tell you very little about their plan, other than, what they pay in premiums and how much they have to pay to satisfy their deductible. 


Excellent Health Insurance Advice from Dateline NBC

Excellent Health Insurance Advice from Doctor Jennifer Ashton on the CBS Morning Show 4/9/09

For many consumers, purchasing a health insurance policy on their own can be an enormous undertaking. Purchasing a health insurance policy is not like buying a car, in that, the buyer knows that the engine and transmission are standard, and that power windows are optional. A health insurance plan is much more ambiguous, and it is often very difficult for the consumer to determine what type of coverage is standard and what other benefits are optional. In my opinion, this is the primary reason that most policy holders don't realize that they do not have coverage for a specific medical treatment until they receive a large bill from the hospital stating that "benefits were denied." Sure, we all complain about insurance companies, but we do know that they serve a "necessary evil."

There are so many variables that consumers have to be aware of when it comes to buying health insurance. These variables, and confusing insurance terminology, are often difficult for the average consumer to understand which is why many small business owners actually put off looking for a new health plan until their rates have skyrocketed to the point that they can no longer afford the monthly premiums. Business owners, who find themselves in this position, often place a greater emphasis on how much the new plan will cost, rather than placing an emphasis on what benefits the new plan will actually offer. 

Quite often, consumers that base their purchasing decision entirely on price, don't even realize that their new plan may not provide coverage for specific medical conditions or that the amount allotted for certain treatments may be extremely limited. And, it usually isn't until they receive a large bill from a medical provider which states that "claims were denied" that they realize that they made a critical mistake in plan selection.

As a small business owner, myself, who primarily deals with other small business owners, I have come to the realization that part of the problem is that it is extremely difficult for individuals purchasing their health plan on the open market to distinguish the difference among health plans. It is also equally difficult for consumers to determine what type of health insurance coverage they actually need for their particular situation. 

Remember, there is a big difference between the type of health plan consumers actually "need" and the type of health plan consumers actually "want." Let me explain. 

Recently, I have read many blog articles that seem to stress that consumers should purchase health plans that offer 100% coverage with a very low deductible. 100% coverage means that after the deductible is met, usually $250, the plan will pay 100% of all covered medical expenses. 

Although I agree that these types of health plans have a great "curb appeal." I can tell you from personal experience that these plans are not for everyone, nor are they affordable. 

Will a low deductible plan that offers 100% coverage offer the policy holder greater peace of mind? Probably. But is a low deductible health plan that offers 100% health insurance coverage something that most consumers really need? Probably not. 

In my professional opinion, consumers must achieve a balance between four important variables; wants, needs, risk and cost when they purchase a health plan. Just like the car analogy, it is important for healthcare consumers to understand what type of health insurance benefits are automatically included or standard and which health insurance benefits are optional. For example, on most health plans, maternity and prescription drug coverage is optional. 

With this in mind, if one is healthy, takes no medications and rarely goes to the doctor, do they really need a 100% plan with a $5 co-payment for prescription drugs if it costs them $300 dollars more a month?  

Would it benefit a person to pay $200 more a month to have a 90/10 plan with a $250 deductible, or should they purchase an 80/20 plan with a $2,500 deductible which allows them to save $200 a month? Wouldn't the 80/20 plan still offer you adequate coverage? Isn't it more cost effective to put that extra $200 that would be spent on insurance premiums, totaling $2,400 per year in their bank account, "just in case" they may get sick or injured and might need to pay their $2,000 deductible?

Isn't it smarter to keep your hard-earned money yourself, rather than pay higher monthly premiums to an insurance company for an illness or injury that may never happen?

This is just one example of consumer-driven health care. Another example is an HSA qualified HPHP. A HSA qualified HDHP (Health Savings Account qualified High Deductible Health Plan) may offer a more affordable healthcare option to individuals that are searching for a health plan with very low monthly premiums. Typically, these plans offer policyholders greater flexibility and control in where their health care dollars are spent. Plans often come with a fixed aggregate family deductible, which mean that a separate deductible does not have to be met for each family member on the plan.

In addition to the significant cost savings, policyholders can fund their Health Savings Account (HSA) to pay for routine medical expenses or alternative medical therapies, like acupuncture.  Any money in the HSA that is not used for medical expenses can be rolled over to the next year and excess funds can be transferred to a tax deductible, tax deferred, interest bearing account, commonly referred to as a "Medical IRA." These types of health plans can offer tremendous tax advantages to policyholders. Not only can policyholders save money on their health insurance premiums, but they also can use this savings to build a nest egg for retirement. Many HSA administrators now offer thousands of no load mutual funds to transfer your HSA funds into so you can potentially earn an even higher rate of interest.

For more information on HSA qualified HDHPs, click here.

In my experience, I believe that individuals who purchase their health plan based on "wants" rather than "needs" feel the most defrauded or "ripped-off" by their insurance company and/or insurance agent. 

In fact, I hear almost identical comments from almost every business owner that I speak to about health insurance. 

Comments, such as:

  • "I have to run my business; I don't have time to be sick!"

  • "I think I have gone to the doctor 2 times in the last 5 years" .......and

  • "My insurance company keeps raising my rates and I don't even use my insurance!"

Again, as a small business owner myself, I can understand the frustration that many small business owners express. So, here is the $64,000 question: 

Q. Is there a simple formula that everyone can follow to make health insurance buying easier?

A. YES. Become an INFORMED insurance consumer!

If you are wondering what I mean by this, let me explain: 

Every time I contact a prospective client or call one of my client referrals, I ask that person a list of questions about their current health insurance policy. You know, that policy that is in their dresser drawer or filing cabinet. 

That same policy that they bought to protect themselves and their family from that "worse case scenario" so they wouldn't have to file bankruptcy or lose their home due to unpaid medical debt. 

That policy that they thought promised coverage for that $500,000 life-saving organ transplant, for the 40 chemotherapy treatments that they may have to undergo if they were diagnosed with cancer or the many months of physical and/or speech therapy that they might need to fully recover from a stroke. 

Q. So, what do you think happens almost 100% of the time when I ask these individuals "BASIC" questions about their health insurance policy?

A. They almost always do not know the answers!   

The following is a list of 10 Questions that I routinely ask a prospective health insurance client.

  •  1.  What Insurance Company are you insured with and what is the name of your health insurance plan? For example, Blue Cross Blue Shield-"Basic Blue." 

  •  2.  What is your Calendar Year Deductible and would you have to pay a separate deductible for each family member if everyone in your family became ill at the same time? For example, the majority of health plans have a per person yearly deductible, for example, $250, $500, $1,000, or $2,500. However, some plans will only require you to pay a 2 person maximum deductible each year, even if everyone in your family needs extensive medical care.  

  •  3.  What is your Coinsurance percentage and what dollar amount (stop loss number) is it based on? For example, a good plan design works this way. After you have satisfied your calendar year deductible, the insurance company will pay 80% ($8,000) and you will pay 20% ($2,000) of the first $10,000 in medical bills that you incur each year. This first $10,000 is termed the "stop loss number." After this brief sharing arrangement is over, the insurance company pays 100% up to the Maximum Lifetime Benefit, which is typically, $2-5 Million per insured for the rest of that calendar year. Then, everything starts over again on the first day of each subsequent calendar year. Stop loss numbers can be as little as $5,000 or $10,000 or as much as $20,000. However, be aware that there are some policies on the market that have NO stop loss number at all! Therefore, it is critical that you ask what your stop loss number is before you purchase a plan. 

  •  4.  What is your Maximum Out of Pocket Expense per year? Keep in mind that the Maximum Out of Pocket Expenses per year includes all deductibles plus all coinsurance percentages plus all applicable access fees, service deductibles or other fees.

  •  5.  What is the Lifetime Maximum Benefit the insurance company will pay if you or someone in your family becomes seriously ill and does your health plan have any "per illness" maximums or caps? For example, some plans may have a $5 Million Lifetime Maximum, but there might be a benefit cap of $100,000 per illness. This means that you would have to develop many separate and unrelated life-threatening illnesses costing $100,000 or less to qualify for the $5 Million of Lifetime Coverage. 

  •  6.  Is your plan a Schedule Plan, in that it only pays a certain amount for a specific list of procedures? For example, Mega Life & Health & Midwest National Life, endorsed by the National Association of the Self-Employed, (N.A.S.E.) endorses schedule plans under the name "Health Markets."

  •  7.  Does your plan have Doctor Copays and are you limited to a certain number of doctor co-pay visits per year? For example, many plans have a limit of how many times you go to the doctor per year for a copay and, quite often the limit is 2-4 visits.  

  •  8.  Does your plan offer Prescription Drug Coverage and if it does, do you pay a co-pay for your prescriptions or do you have to meet a separate drug deductible before you receive any benefits and/or do you just have a discount prescription card only? For example, some plans offer you prescription drug benefits right away, while other plans require that you pay a separate drug deductible before you can receive prescription medication for a copay. Today, many plans offer no copay options and only provide you with a discount prescription card that only gives you a 10-20% discount on all prescription medications. This is a dangerous policy design that can lead to catastrophic out of pocket expenses if you were to contract any one of a host of major medical conditions such as, Multiple Sclerosis or Rheumatoid Arthritis that require expensive outpatient maintenance medications which are usually not available in Generic form. 

  •  9.  Does your plan have any reduction in benefits for Organ Transplants and if so, what is the maximum your plan will pay if you need an organ transplant? For example, some plans only pay a $100,000 maximum benefit for organ transplants for a procedure that actually costs as much as $500K or more. In addition, this $100,000 maximum may also include the cost of expensive anti-rejection medications that have to be taken after a transplant. If this is the case, the insured will often have to pay for all anti-rejection medications (a.k.a. Immunosuppressants) out of pocket. Keep in mind that these medications are among the most expensive medications which individuals requiring an organ transplant will have to take for the rest of their life.

  •  10.  Do you have to pay a Separate Deductible or Access Fee for each hospital admission or for each emergency room visit? For example, some plans, like the Assurant Health's "CoreMed" plan have a separate $750 hospital admission fee that you pay for the first 3 days you are in the hospital. This fee is in addition to your plan deductible. Keep in mind that many plans have benefit "caps" or "access fees" for out-patient services, such as, physical therapy, speech therapy, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, etc. Benefit "caps" could be as little as $500 for each out-patient treatment, leaving you a bill for the remaining balance if the fee for that particular service exceeds $500. "Access fees" are also additional fees that you are required to pay per treatment. For example, for each outpatient chemotherapy treatment, you may be required to pay a $250 "access fee" per treatment. So for 40 chemotherapy treatments, you would have to pay 40 x $250 = $10,000. Again, these fees would be charged in addition to your plan deductible

Now that you have read the list of questions that I ask a prospective health insurance client, ask yourself. How many questions you were able to answer? 

If you were not able to answer all ten, don't be discouraged. That does not necessarily mean that you are not a smart consumer. I am sure you comparison shop for everything else. Maybe you were just extremely confused by all of the insurance terminology or you had a "bad" insurance agent who did not take the time to really explain the type of coverage you were purchasing.  

So how would you know if you dealt with a "bad" insurance agent? Because a "great" insurance agent would have taken the time to help you really understand your insurance benefits and s/he would have answered all of your questions about your health plan purchase BEFORE you signed on the dotted line. 

Remember, insurance agents are not different from any other professional. There are "great" insurance agents and brokers that care about clients and offer exceptional customer service, and then there are "bad" agents that avoid answering questions and typically don't return phone calls when clients leave messages about unpaid claims or skyrocketing health insurance premiums.

Q. How do you know if you have a "great" agent?   

A. A "great" agent will recommend a health insurance plan based on all four variables; wants, needs, risk and cost. A "great" agent gives you enough information to weigh all of your options so you can make an informed purchasing decision. And, lastly, a "great" agent looks out for YOUR best interest and NOT the best interest of the insurance company.

Another way to tell whether or not you have a "great" or a "bad" insurance agent is to determine how many of the ten questions you were actually able to answer without looking at your health insurance policy.

If you were able to answer all ten questions, you have a "great" insurance agent. 

If you were able to answer at least seven out of ten questions, you probably have a "good" insurance agent. But, if you were only able to answer a few questions or less than seven out of the ten, you most likely have a "bad" insurance agent. 

Always keep in mind that your health insurance purchase is just as important as purchasing a house or a car, if not more important. So don't be afraid to ask your insurance agent a lot of questions to make sure that you understand what your health plan does and, more importantly, does not cover.

If you don't feel comfortable with the type of coverage that your insurance agent suggests or if you think the price for the plan is too high, ask your agent if s/he can select a comparable plan so you can make a side by side comparison before you make a purchase. 

And, always make sure that you read all of the "fine print" in your health plan brochure and please remember to take the time to read through your policy during your "10-day free look period." 

Remember, if you don't understand something, or aren't quite sure what the asterisk (*) next to the benefit description really means in terms of coverage, call your insurance agent or contact the insurance company directly to ask for further clarification. Furthermore, make sure you take the time to perform your own research on the Internet. 

For example, if you research Mega Life and Health and Midwest National Life Insurance Company, endorsed by the National Association for the Self Employed (NASE), you will find out that there have been multiple class action lawsuits brought against these companies since 1995. Many health insurance companies, especially the ones that have to pay huge insurance fines often change their name and target more unsuspecting consumers. In fact, today these companies are selling health insurance under the name "Health Markets." 

So please perform your own due diligence and ask yourself, "Is this a company that I can trust to pay my health insurance claims?"

Additionally, find out if your agent is a "captive" insurance agent or an insurance "broker." 

Why?  

"Captive" insurance agents can only offer ONE insurance company's products. In contrast, an "Independent" agent or insurance "Broker" can offer you a variety of different insurance plans from many different quality carriers.  

Over the years, I have developed strong and trusting relationships with my clients and I am constantly developing new clients through existing client referrals. This is partly because of my level of insurance expertise and primarily due to the level of personal service that I provide.

Because personal service is extremely critical to building long-term client relationships, this is the main reason that I caution people to be very careful when using online quoting engines and online applications to buy health insurance on the Internet. 

Again, in my professional opinion, there are too many variables to consider when shopping for health insurance. Therefore, I am a firm believer that a health insurance purchase requires the level of expertise and personal attention that only an insurance professional can provide. And, since it does not cost a penny more to purchase your health insurance through an independent agent or broker, my advice to you would be to use Ebay and Amazon for your less important purchases and to use a knowledgeable, ethical and reputable independent agent or broker for one of the most important purchases you will ever make....your health insurance policy.

Lastly, if you have any concerns about an insurance company, contact your state's Department of Insurance BEFORE you buy your policy. Your state's Department of Insurance can tell you if the insurance company is registered in your state and can also tell you if there have been any complaints against that company that have been filed by policyholders.

Also, if you suspect that your agent is trying to sell you a fraudulent insurance policy, for example, you have to become a member of a union to qualify for coverage, or s/he isn't being honest with you, your state's Department of Insurance can also check to see if your agent is licensed and whether or not there has ever been any disciplinary action previously taken against that agent.

In closing, I hope I have given you enough information so you can become an INFORMED insurance consumer and you can understand why "The Best Policy Is A Great Agent." Whatever decision you make in regards to your health insurance, please always remember to heed the following words of wisdom.  

  • "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is!" ..........and

  • "If you only buy on price, you get what you pay for!"

What Do Women Really Want? Watch The Video Below To Find Out.

Ten Questions You Should Ask Your Agent Before You Buy A Policy

If you are a business owner, self-employed or an employee of a company that is not offered medical coverage through your employer, you may have to undertake the frustrating, daunting and time consuming task of purchasing health insurance on your own. If this is the case, there are certain things that you can do become an informed consumer so you can ensure that you are purchasing the type of health insurance coverage you really need at a price you can afford.

When you purchase a health insurance plan, it is important that you balance four important variables:
wants, needs, risk and cost, before you spend your money.

Although you may "want" a health plan that offers you 100% coverage and a $5 Copay for prescription medications, you may not "need" this type of health plan if you are healthy, take no medications and do not have any significant health related "risk" factors.

Since a 100% health plan will "cost" significantly more than an 80/20 Plan, it may not be in your best interest to pay higher monthly premiums for 100% coverage if you are currently healthy.

Although no one knows exactly when they will actually use their insurance coverage, considering these four key variables prior to purchasing a health plan is a good rule of thumb.

It is also critical for health insurance consumers to understand that all plans, even 100% Plans, have some form of coverage limitations. Knowing what your policy DOES NOT cover, is more important than knowing what it DOES cover.

Many plans also have a separate deductible for emergency room visits. These deductibles are in place to discourage policyholders from using the emergency room as a doctor's office. Typically, these ER deductibles are waived if the patient is admitted to the hospital. 

The following is a list of 10 key questions that should help health insurance consumers to better understand the coverage limitations of the plans they are considering purchasing. Make sure you ask your insurance agent these questions BEFORE purchasing a health insurance policy. 

  •   1. What insurance company do you represent and are you a "captive" agent, "independent" agent or an insurance "broker?" "Captive" agents represent ONE insurance company's products only.

An "independent" agent or insurance "broker," on the other hand, typically represent many quality insurance carriers and can sell a variety of different insurance products without any contractual restrictions.

BEWARE!  Dealing with a "captive" agent may limit your choices, since these agents can only sell that particular insurance company's health plans.

  •   2. What is the plan's calendar year Deductible and would I have to pay a separate deductible for each family member if everyone in my family became ill at the same time? The majority of health plans have a per person calendar year deductible, for example, $250, $500, $1,000, or $2,500. Some plans are designed so in a "worse case scenario" only two family members will have to pay their deductible in any given calendar year.

BEWARE! Some plans will require each person in the family to pay their calendar year deductible. This can be a huge financial burden if everyone in the family was involved in an accident or if members of the family became ill at the same time.  Many plans have a separate drug deductible before the plan will pay for any medications. Make sure you know what deductibles you will be responsible for before you buy a health plan.

  •   3. What is the plan's Coinsurance percentage and what Stop Loss Number is this percentage based on?  

    These percentages are typically based on a specific dollar amount, known as the "stop loss number." Here's where it get's tricky. Quite often, health insurance plans have different "stop loss numbers".
    I have seen some plans that have a "stop loss number" as low as $2,000 and as high as $25,000 or some with none at all. 

Let's figure out the insured's maximum out of pocket on an 80/20 plan that has a $1,000 deductible and an 80/20 split of the first $5,000 ("stop loss number.")

$1,000 + 20% of $5,000 ($1,000) = A Maximum Out of Pocket of $2,000. 

Now, let's figure out the insured's maximum out of pocket on an 80/20 plan that has a $250 deductible and a $10,000 "stop loss number."

$250 + 20% of $10,000  ($2000) = A Maximum Out of Pocket of $2,250. (Note: Total does not include any separate "service deductibles" or access fees. Many low quality plans also have these.) 

Again, after this brief 80/20 cost sharing with the insurance company, also know as a the coinsurance percentage split, most major medical plans will pay 100% of in-network covered charges up to the Lifetime Maximum amount that is specified in the policy.

BEWARE! Some policies on the market are sold with NO stop loss, but still list a coinsurance percentage. Therefore if you purchase an 80/20 with no stop loss, you will actually be paying 20% of all of your medical bills each calendar year. So unless you want to be responsible for 20% of all of your bills, make sure you find out what the "stop loss number" is BEFORE you purchase a health plan!

  •   4. What is the plan's Maximum Out Of Pocket Expenses per year? This expense is a total of all deductibles, plus all coinsurance percentages, plus all applicable "access fees", "service deductibles" or other "fees" outlined in your policy.

BEWARE! Quite often agents neglect to tell prospects about hidden fees, so make sure you have a good grasp on the basics, like deductibles, coinsurance & stop loss numbers. Always ask about additional "fees" BEFORE you purchase the plan!

  •   5. What is the plan's Lifetime Maximum Benefit if I become seriously ill and does the plan have any "per illness" maximums or caps? The majority of health insurance plans have a two million or five million dollar Lifetime Maximum Benefit. The Lifetime Maximum Benefit is the maximum amount the insurance company will pay if you or someone in your family becomes seriously ill.

BEWARE! Some policies will stipulate that there is a maximum benefit cap of $100,000 per illness. This means that you would have to develop many separate and unrelated life-threatening illnesses costing $100,000 or less to qualify for the five million dollar Lifetime Maximum Benefit. Mega Life & Health, Midwest National Life a.k.a. Health Markets, formerly U.I.C.I., endorsed and promoted by the National Association for the Self Employed (N.A.S.E) and the Alliance for Affordable Services are known for selling "schedule" plans with "per illness caps."

  •   6. Is the plan a Schedule Plan, in that it only pays a certain amount for a specific list of procedures? Some health plans only pay a specific dollar amount for certain procedures, despite the fact that the procedure often cost more than the plan stimulates.

BEWARE! Mega Life & Health, Midwest National Life a.k.a. Health Markets, formerly U.I.C.I., endorsed and promoted by the National Association for the Self Employed (NASE) and the Alliance for Affordable Services are known for selling "schedule" plans.

  •  7. Does the plan have unlimited doctor copays or is there a limited number of doctor copay visits allowed each year? Many quality plans have no limit on the number of times you can use your doctor copay.

BEWARE! Several plans have a limit of how many times you can go to the doctor each year for a Copay. Quite often, the limit is 2-4 visits per year.

  •  8. Does the plan offer Prescription Drug Coverage and if it does, what type of coverage? Some plans offer prescription drug benefits on both generic and brand name medications right away. Other plans will require you to pay a separate outpatient prescription drug deductible before you can obtain your prescription medication for a Copay.

BEWARE! Today, many plans offer NO outpatient prescription drug Copay options. Typically, these plans only provide the insured with a discount prescription card which only offers the insured a 10-20% discount on prescription medications. This can lead to catastrophic out of pocket expenses to the insured.

  •  9. Does the plan have any reduction in benefits for Organ Transplants and if so, what is the maximum the plan will pay out for an organ transplant? The majority of quality major medical plans treat organ transplants as any other illness. This means that the insurance company will cover the insured until the Lifetime Maximum Benefit of the plan is reached. Again, in most cases, this Lifetime Maximum is five million dollars. You should accept no less than one million dollars of coverage for Organ Transplants.

BEWARE! Today, some plans only pay a $100,000 maximum benefit for organ transplants. Plans that offer limited organ transplant coverage are extremely risky, since organ transplant procedures often range in the neighborhood of $350-$500K. In addition, it is not uncommon for a transplant patient to need a second organ transplant. Keep in mind, that the $100,000 maximum payment for organ transplants on many plans also includes the cost of expensive anti-rejection medications. If you have an organ transplant, you will quickly reach the $100,000 maximum benefit, which means that you will be required to pay for costly anti-rejection medication out of pocket. This can lead to catastrophic out of pocket costs to the insured.

  •  10. Does the plan have any separate "services deductibles" or "access fee" for each hospital admission or for each outpatient test? Some plans, like Assurant Health's "CoreMed" plan have a separate $750 hospital admission fee for the first three days of each hospital stay. These hospital admission fees may also be called "Access Fees" on other policies. Typically the insured is responsible for paying these access fees for each hospital admission in addition to their calendar year health plan deductible.

BEWARE! "Access fees" and "service deductibles" are separate from your plan's calendar year health plan deductible. Be aware that many plans now have benefit "caps" or "access fees" for out-patient services, such as, physical therapy, speech therapy, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, etc. These "benefit caps" could be as little as $500 for each out-patient treatment, which will leave the insured responsible for the remaining balance that is over $500.

Again, "access fees" are additional fees that you may have to pay per treatment before the insurance company will pay the provider.  These fees can quickly add up. For example, if you need to have 40 outpatient chemotherapy treatments, and you must pay a $250 "access fee" per treatment, you would have to pay an additional 40 x $250 = $10,000.

Remember, purchasing a health plan is the most important purchase you will ever make. Insist that your insurance agent explain to you exactly what your health plan does and does not cover and take the time to read the "fine print" in the plan brochure and ask questions about terminology you don't completely understand.

In addition, when you receive your health insurance policy in the mail, don't just detach your insurance cards and place them in your wallet or purse and then throw your insurance policy in your desk drawer or filing cabinet. Take the time to sit down and read your policy page by page.

Once you receive your policy, you have a 10-day free look period, so if your coverage is not what you thought you purchased, you have time to call the insurance company and cancel the policy without incurring any fees.

Finally, if your being pitched a health plan that seems to good to be true (e.g. all pre existing conditions are covered, the plan is significantly cheaper than all other plans) contact your state's Department of Insurance BEFORE you buy the policy. Your state's Department of Insurance can tell you if the insurance company is registered in your state and can also tell you if there have been any complaints against that company that have been filed by policyholders.

Remember, if you suspect that your being scammed or you think the agent is trying to sell you a fraudulent insurance policy, (e.g. you have to become a member of a union to qualify for coverage) your state's Department of Insurance can also check to see if any prior disciplinary action has been previously taken against that agent.

Don’t Fall Victim To Health Insurance Scams: 10 Red Flags You Should Watch Out For

In today's fast paced world, business owners don't often have the time to thoroughly check out the companies they rely on to provide goods and services. In many cases, a determination of product/service quality can be made at the time goods are delivered or services are rendered. If goods or services do not meet expectations, there is often an immediate remedy available.  For example, poor quality goods can be shipped back to the supplier and/or payment for services can be withheld until services are satisfactorily rendered.

Unfortunately, business owners do not always purchase items that are tangible items, in the sense that they can immediately determine the quality of the goods and/or services at the time of purchase. One example of such a purchase is health insurance.  Since health insurance is not usually used immediately after purchase, the quality of care or the legitimacy of the policy may not even come into play until the business owner, or a family member, actually needs to have medical treatment. This is one of the primary reasons that many companies, often appearing legitimate, can get away with selling bogus health insurance coverage to unsuspecting business owners.

In most cases, fraudulent health insurance policies are sold to business owners by telemarketers or "agents" through bogus Associations and Unions. In that, the buyer must join a professional and/or trade association or become a union member to qualify for health insurance. In fact, in a study published by the U.S. General Accountability Office (GAO) in 2004, the GAO found that association schemes ranked at the top of the marketing methods followed by bogus health insurers.  According to the report, "Employers and Individuals Are Vulnerable to Unauthorized or Bogus Entities Selling Coverage, between 2000 and 2002, the U.S. Department of Labor and state insurance regulators identified 144 unauthorized entities selling health insurance unlawfully. These entities defrauded 15,000 employers and more than 200,000 policyholders out of $252 million."

However, it is important to mention that many individual and group health insurance products are endorsed by reputable Associations, such as the AARP and the American Bar Association and, many reputable Unions, such as the AFL-CIO and the Teamsters.  These organizations have long been recognized for bringing a common class of professionals or citizens together for other purposes that have very little to do with health insurance. Membership commonly includes a wide range of other benefits in addition to discounted health insurance. Typically, the organizations have a governing organization, a constitution and bylaws, a set of officers, voting rights, regular membership meetings and a professional code of conduct. 

Unfortunately, most individuals do not find out that they were making hefty monthly payments or premiums to fraudulent Associations or Unions until they have a severe condition that requires medical treatment. Usually, it isn't until after they receive treatment that they receive notice from their medical provider that the claim that was submitted to the insurance company was denied and that all the medical charges that were incurred are now their responsibility.

Often, the scheme starts when business owners are contacted by telephone or approached by someone who claims to represent a certain, official sounding, Association or Union. The business owner is then informed that if s/he becomes a member of the Association or joins the Union, s/he could qualify for a low cost group or individual health insurance plan. Typically the Association or Union is promoted to represent self-employed individuals and small business owners. The low cost health insurance is usually presented as one of the many "perks" that the business owner can qualify for, in addition to many other "member" benefits, like discounts on other services, such as dental, eyeglasses, office supplies, hotels, rental cars, etc. 

In many instances, these bogus companies involve licensed health insurance agents to sell their fraudulent health insurance products. Sometimes the "agents" know the products are fraudulent, other times, the "agent" also falls prey to the scheme.  Often, the schemes prey upon consumers who have been previously declined insurance coverage or suffer from a pre-existing condition. Since these consumers have very limited options to purchase private health insurance coverage, the benefits of an Association or Union membership that offers health insurance coverage for a "membership fee" or "union due" is enticing. To the unsuspecting consumer that has a pre-existing medical condition or is paying high premiums for coverage, the "membership fee" or "union due" is a small price to pay for what they believe will be a quality health plan that provides "guaranteed" coverage with no "pre-existing condition exclusions" and  no "waiting periods."

In many circumstances, the print materials that are left with the consumer are very well designed, however, the majority of the time, the language in the "health plan brochure," if there is one, is very unclear. The literature may name the entity that is authorized to act as the health plan administrator of the plan, but neglect to name the actual insurance company that is providing the health insurance coverage. Unfortunately, it is often difficult for the consumer to separate the illegitimate companies selling official sounding health plans from the legitimate ones. Typically fraudulent health plans have many commonalities. 

Here are 10 "Red Flags" that may indicate health insurance fraud:

  •  1.) The "agent" is not a licensed insurance agent but an "enrollment" or "membership" coordinator.

  •  2.) The term "discount plan" is written in the product literature, but the term health plan, health insurance or policy is frequently used by the plan promoter. Discount plans often provide nothing more than a discount for medical services, such as prescription medications, eyeglasses, dental, etc.  These plans are not designed to offer major medical health insurance coverage.

  •  3.) The official sounding "Association or Union" is one that you have never heard of before.

  •  4.) The plan is referred to as an ERISA plan. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) is a federal law that allows employers to set up employee benefit plans for employees and their dependents. ERISA plans are not subject to state regulation and are not regulated by the state insurance commissioner.  ERISA plans are normally not sold as health insurance, but are instead, established by employers, unions or groups acting on behalf of employers.  Therefore, unsuspecting buyers believe these plans actually offer health insurance coverage, when if fact, they do not.

  •  5.) The buyer is told that the "membership fee or union dues" includes the health insurance premium, but there is no mention of the word "premium" in any of the plan literature.

  •  6.) The plan offers "guaranteed" insurance coverage with no exclusions for "pre-existing conditions" and no "waiting periods."

  •  7.) The plan is significantly cheaper in price than other health insurance plans.

  •  8.) The term "reinsured" is used in regards to the plan. Reinsurance is something insurance companies buy to protect themselves against their own risks. It is insurance for insurance companies. Licensed insurers rarely have their agents mention any of their reinsurance arrangements during a sales presentation.

  •  9.) The Association or Union is comprised of members from all walks of life and/or requires its members to state that they belong to a certain trade, class or group of professionals that they have no affiliation with, for example, the Association or Union is said to be comprised of "Food and Beverage" workers, but "Florists" and "Machinists" are allowed to enroll as members.

  •  10.) If the Association or Union is said to have a special arrangement with a health insurance company, a plan administrator or another third party that has designed the plan using a legal "loophole" that allows members to purchase health insurance at a discounted rate or to purchase a individual or group health insurance policy.

So how can you protect yourself from falling victim to a fraudulent insurance scam?  Make sure you contact your state's department of Insurance to determine if the health insurance company and the third-party administrator are licensed to do business in your state and make sure that the "agent" selling the plan is a "licensed health insurance agent."  Additionally, make sure that health insurance company has been approved to sell the particular policy that is being offered.  Since it may be difficult to tell if fraud is involved, always put off buying your health insurance policy until you have had the opportunity to perform your own due diligence.

COBRA Stimulus is coming to an end. What are your Health Insurance options now?

 If you are one of the many American's who elected to take advantage of a 65% reduction of your COBRA continuation premiums under  the "American  Recovery and Reinvestment Act Of 2009" your reduced COBRA premium would have increased substantially in the  month of December 2009 when the "Cobra Stimulus" was originally planned to come to an end. However on December 21st 2009,  President Obama signed an extension to the ARRA "Cobra Stimulus" which continues the 65% reduction until February 28th. 2009:  Following are the key provisions of the COBRA subsidy extension:

  •  The amount of time an AEI can receive a subsidy increases from nine to 15 months.

  •  The subsidy eligibility period is expanded to include the period that begins with September 1, 2008, and ends with February 28, 2010 (formerly December 31, 2009). Significantly, the new rule does not require that COBRA coverage begin by the end of the period (February 28). Instead, the person is an AEI as long as the COBRA qualifying event (involuntary termination of employment) occurs by  February 28, 2010 and is entitled to COBRA coverage as a result of that event.

  •  For any AEI for whom the premium subsidy now applies due to the extension, there is a transition period consisting of any period of coverage that begins before the extension's enactment date. Any period during which the applicable premium had been paid is to be treated as a period of coverage, irrespective of any failure to timely pay the applicable premium for such period.

  •  Plan administrators must provide a notice on extension rights to AEIs who did not timely pay the COBRA premium for any period of coverage during their transition period or paid the full (non-subsidized) premium without regard to the subsidy rules. The notice must be provided within the first 60 days of their transition period, and must include information on the ability to make retroactive premium payments as a result of the transition period.

  •  In the case of any premium for a period of coverage during an AEI's transition period, an AEI shall be treated for purposes of any COBRA provision as having timely paid the premium amount if he or she: (a) was covered under the COBRA coverage to which such premium relates for the period of coverage immediately preceding the transition period; and (b) pays, not later than 60 days after the extension enactment date (or, if later, 30 days after the new notices are provided) the amount of the subsidized premium.

  •  In the case of an AEI who, during his or her transition period, paid the full premium amount for such coverage without regard to the subsidy amount, ARRA's rules allowing for that AEI to be reimbursed for the excess premiums will apply.

  •  Plan administrators must provide notices of the new extension rights to individuals who became AEIs on or after October 31, 2009, or experience a qualifying event (consisting of termination of employment) relating to COBRA coverage on or after that date. The notice must be provided within 60 days after the extension's enactment date or, in the case of a qualifying event occurring after the enactment date, consistent with the timing of COBRA notices.

The question that everyone is asking now is, "If I can't afford my Cobra  premium once the Stimulus expires what are my options?" Kimberly Langford at Kiplinger's Personal Finance discusses:

Excellent Advice on what to do after your Cobra subsidy ends from Kimberly Lankford at Kiplinger's Personal Finance on CNBC May 16th, 2009

As Kimberly mentions, there are several lower cost alternatives to paying high priced COBRA continuation premiums.  Depending on what State you live in, there may be other health insurance options that you can select when you first lose your job, when your 9 month subsidy expires or when COBRA finally runs out at the end of 18 months. They are as follows:

Let's take a look at these alternative plans:

  •  1.  The first option is "State Continuation of Coverage." This option can only be elected when you first lose your employment. State Continuation of Coverage does not follow Cobra continuation laws, it does however allow you to continue your employer sponsored group coverage for up to 9 months even if your former employer employed less than 20 employees. This law does not apply to self-funded plans, so make sure to check with your State's Department of Insurance to see if your State mandates State Continuation of Coverage.
     

  •  2.  The second option, an "Individual Health Insurance Policy" is typically the best and most affordable alternative for relatively healthy individuals. An individual health plan can be purchased at any time and is a great way to maintain many of the same kinds of benefits that you had through your former employer sponsored group health plan.

However, an Individual Health Insurance policy has to be "underwritten" before it is issued. During the "underwriting" process, the insurance company scrutinizes the applicant's health history to determine if it will extend an offer for insurance coverage. This process allows the insurance company to "decline" coverage to applicants with serious pre-existing or chronic medical conditions or to modify the coverage it extends to the applicant.

Today, the "Individual" health insurance market has become quite competitive; therefore, many insurance carriers are willing to offer health insurance coverage to individuals with certain controlled pre-existing medical conditions, like high blood pressure or high cholesterol. 

Other times, the insurance company will offer the applicant coverage, but will refuse to cover a specific body part or pre-existing condition. In these cases, the insurance company issues what is known as an "exclusion rider." An exclusion rider is a way for the insurance company to exclude coverage for a specific body part or a specific medical condition (e.g. right knee, uterine fibroids). Exclusion riders can be permanent (body part or condition excluded from coverage for the life of the policy) or temporary, (body part or condition excluded from coverage for a specific period of time.)

Often, if an exclusion rider is placed on a body part and the insured receives no further treatment on that body part or if the rider is in place to exclude a pre-existing medical condition and the insured's condition completely resolves, the policyholder can request that the insurance company remove the exclusion rider from the policy. Typically, requests to remove a rider can be made after one or two years. Ultimately, the insurance company will make the final decision on whether the exclusion rider will be removed.

An HSA qualified HDHP (Health Savings Account qualified High Deductible Health Plan) may offer a more affordable consumer-driven healthcare option to individuals that are searching for a health plan with very low monthly premiums. Typically, these plans offer policyholders greater flexibility and control in where their health care dollars are spent. Plans often come with a fixed aggregate family deductible, which mean that a separate deductible does not have to be met for each family member on the plan.

In addition to the significant cost savings, policyholders can fund their Health Savings Account (HSA) to pay for routine medical expenses or alternative medical therapies, like acupuncture.  Any money in the HSA that is not used for medical expenses can be rolled over to the next year and excess funds can be transferred to a tax deductible, tax deferred, interest bearing account, commonly referred to as a "Medical IRA." These types of health plans can offer tremendous tax advantages to policyholders. Not only can policyholders save money on their health insurance premiums, but they also can use these savings to build a nest egg for retirement. Many HSA administrators now offer thousands of no load mutual funds to transfer your HSA funds into so you can potentially earn an even higher rate of interest.

For more information on HSA qualified HDHPs, click here.

  •  3.  The third option is a "Small Group Health Insurance Plan." This type of plan can be purchased immediately and might just be the answer for those individuals that that have been "declined" coverage for an "Individual" health plan. It might also be another option for individuals who are looking for coverage without an "exclusion rider" on a pre-existing medical condition. This is so because group health insurance provides "guaranteed insurability," which means that all applicants and their families will receive health insurance coverage for all pre-existing medical conditions. However, the price can be exorbitant. Most States allow the insurance company to place an "underwriting premium load" as high as 67% on to a Small Group Health Insurance plan specifically because they can not exclude coverage for pre-existing conditions. In Indiana that load can be as high as 108% and in Michigan as high as 300%. Make sure to ask your Broker or Agent what the maximum underwriting load allowance is in your State BEFORE you apply for a Group Health Insurance Plan. In most States you must have a corporate Tax I.D. number and one other person (employee, Business Partner or Spouse) to enroll in the Group Health Insurance Plan with you. There are States such as Colorado that have "Self Employed Groups of One". Check with your Broker or Agent for more information on what is available on a Guaranteed Issue basis in your State. Or call your State's Department of Insurance.

On a Small Group Health Insurance plan, a large portion of the monthly premiums are determined by the health status of those individuals participating in the plan. This is important to remember as your company grows. Even if only one individual has a serious medical condition, that individual's condition is likely to adversely affect everyone's health insurance premiums. This means that even healthy group participants will pay a higher monthly premium. It may also mean that premiums can increase dramatically (up to the aforementioned 67% or higher) if someone covered on the group plan develops a serious condition or if an individual with a serious medical condition is hired at a later date.  

The main advantage of a Small Group Health Insurance Plan is that it provides seamless continuation of coverage for those individuals who have pre-existing conditions such as Diabetes or Cancer providing that they have a minimum of 18 months of prior continuous health insurance coverage with no lapse in coverage of more than 63 days.

  •  4.  The fourth option is a "State Insurance Risk Pool." This option is primarily for individuals who have serious medical conditions and who have been "declined" individual health insurance coverage. Many states, but not all, provide individuals with pre-existing conditions the opportunity to obtain seamless continuation of health insurance coverage after their COBRA continuation expires, or if they lost their employer sponsored group coverage due to a policy cancellation and they were unable to obtain an individual health insurance policy on the open market because of their pre-existing conditions.

State Insurance Risk Pools often offer immediate coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions that would normally render them "uninsurable" on the individual health insurance market. To qualify for a State Insurance Risk Pool, applicants must have elected Cobra continuation coverage and exhausted that Cobra continuation coverage for the full 18 months. Or, they must have lost their former employer sponsored group health insurance coverage through NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN. Meaning, that the employer cancelled the group health insurance policy altogether, thereby leaving the former employee with no Cobra (or State) continuation options. Although Risk Pool coverage is also available to those who have been "declined" coverage on an Individual Health Insurance policy, there is usually a 6 or 12 month waiting period before pre-existing conditions will be covered. There can also be waiting lists for this second type of State Risk Pool Coverage. To find if your State has a State High Risk Insurance Pool, click here

Tyranny Disguised As Health Care Reform & How To Truly Reform Health Insurance

So now that the "Public Option" is dead & the Medicare "Buy In Option" is dead and the Democrats have now passed their 'Historic" Health Care "reform" bill in the Senate. What's next?  Well, since the Democrats Super Majority has been eliminated by the election of Senator Scott Brown from Massachusetts. The Democrats are no longer able to shove through their bill against the will of the majority of Americans. This being the case, they are now seeking to use the "reconciliation process" (a.ka. "the nuclear option") to pass select "pieces" of their health care "reform" bills. However, thanks to Senator Jim Demint and his team of Patriots this attempt will fail as well due to a little known loophole that could allow them to offer an indefinite number of amendments during the reconciliation process. It is for this reason that in my informed opinion, the Democrats health care "reform" bills are now OFFICIALLY DEAD! House Minority Whip Eric Cantor agrees. Below are his comments on the Great Van Sustren show February 10th, 2010.

In Preparation for the Presidents "Bi-Partisan" meeting that was held on February 25, 2010, President Obama rolled out a "new improved" health care reform plan of his own. Sadly, this plan contains the WORST PARTS of the first two bills and for the first time in American History puts the Government in control of health insurance premiums ACROSS THE BOARD. In fact, the only reason the "Bi Partisan Televised Health Care Summit" happened at all is because the Democrats are now FORCED to go back to the drawing board and begin the process of reform on a BI PARTISAN and TRANSPARENT basis JUST LIKE THE PRESIDENT PROMISED IT WOULD BE BEFORE THE PROCESS BEGAN:



Overall this 6 hour debacle was a COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME but Representative Paul Ryan's (R) comments on that day are worth the listen and frankly, this is ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW:

Why did the Democrats entire health care "reform" process fall apart EVEN THOUGH THEY MAINTAINED A SUPER MAJORITY? Before I even begin detailing their nightmarish process of incompetency and blatant partisanship, let me first expose a little piece of information that the Democrats DO NOT want you to know. If we were to simply cut the $760 BILLION in annual waste that exists in our current Health Care system, we could provide EVERY SINGLE ONE of the 46 Million Uninsured a Gold Plated Health Care plan that would make the CEOs of Blue Cross Blue Shield GREEN with envy. Oh, and it would only cost us HALF of the aforementioned $760 BILLION. So WHY in GOD's NAME do the Democrats want to spend $2.4 TRILLION over the next 10 years to cover the 46 Million Uninsured AND also MANDATE the purchase of GOVERNMENT APPROVED HEALTH INSURANCE? Because it's not about health care, it's about Tyranny. 

The massive 2074 pg. Senate Health Care reform bill is called the Patient Protection Affordable Care Act and Harry Reid SWEARS it's "deficit neutral" and that it "protects" Medicare. Even though he planned to expand Medicare to Americans as young as age 55. This was a "trade off" that took place when the Public Option was FINALLY killed on December 9, 2009 and replaced with the now equally dead Medicare "Buy In Option". Did I mention that Medicare is already BANKRUPT with a $43 Trillion deficit as of January 2008? Maybe this is why Timothy Geithner, Kathleen Sebelius, Hilda  Solis and Michael Astrue were less than encouraging in their troubling 2009 annual report on Social Security & Medicare. Did I also mention that in order to GET Medicare at age 55 they were planning on charging $7,600 a year in premiums to each enrollee at a cost to Tax Payers of more than $1 TRILLION? I'm glad that's Dead. But wait! The bill still cuts Medicare by $500 BILLION!
Here's the BEST PART of these bills! No health care "Hope" or "Change" begins until 2014! In fact, the only thing that begins is HIGHER TAXES for all of us who actually pay taxes and who most likely ALREADY HAVE OUR OWN HEALTH INSURANCE!

Even before the "Public Option" provision in the Senate bill was killed, there was a provision in the bill for States to "opt out" of the Government Health Insurance option. I wonder if this is because they actually READ the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 9th or 10th Amendment of our Constitution which clearly prove that these bills are UNCONSTITUTIONAL? Remember when Speaker Pelosi said that the bill will "not add ONE dime to the deficit"? I can only assume that she "mis-spoke" because these bills will add MILLIONS OF DIMES TO OUR DEFICIT. In fact, they are Ponzi schemes that would make Bernie Madoff look like a philanthropist!

These bills are economy KILLERS, Small Business KILLERS and Middle Class destroyers! Equally troubling is the fact that those who have been chosen to represent our best interests apparently have NO IDEA that we have NO MONEY to pay for this! We have now amassed a $12 TRILLION National Deficit. With this reckless spending comes consequences. The Inflation Institute outlines exactly what those consequences will be below in their short but powerful film:

By the way, if you think EITHER of these bills will cost less than $2.4 Trillion, you might want to do your own due diligence like the CATO Institute did. John Boehner tells us ALL ABOUT these bloated pieces of Govt. special interest payola on America's News Room:  

An even better assessment was made on 10/30/09 by Constitutional Attorney Mark Levin of the Landmark Legal Foundation. This could be the reason why the Wall Street Journal called the House bill "The Worst Bill EVER". Worse yet! These bills literally commit HARD TYRANNY on the American citizen BY IMPRISONING AMERICAN CITIZENS FOR UP TO 5 YEARS if they don't BUY HEALTH INSURANCE! Oh yeah it's in there! I have a natural aversion to fine print. So I've taken the Liberty of "blowing up the IRS code" (pun intended).

Want more proof? Here's some clarification on the fine and prison time clauses directly from Congress http://bit.ly/25P0Y0. If you have not read House Health Care "Reform" Bill HR3200 yet, below is a video that highlights some gems from this nightmarish bill:

One of the most enjoyable videos I have seen in a LONG time is the one where Speaker Pelosi was asked by an intrepid reporter if she felt it was "fair" to imprison people who do not buy Health Insurance. Always nice to see a politician squirm when questioned about their OWN LEGISLATION!



How are former Health Care reform activists responding to this? Watch
MSNBC's Dylan Ratigan Yell at Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) as she tries to "spin" the truth about the health care "reform" bills.

Even the Patron Saint of health care "reform" Dr. Howard Dean is now saying KILL THIS BILL!

Keith Olbermann goes a step further and states "I will got to jail before I buy Obamacare Insurance!" KILL THIS BILL!

Pelosi's Bill will also cut $500 BILLION in Medicare. What will that do? Listen to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell on 11/17/09

Congressman Ed Whitfield (Kentucky) lists some other "ugly truths" about Pelosi's "health care reform" bill (also on 11/17/09):

Did I also mention that Senator Barbara Mikulski's (Maryland Democrat) bill that designates ABORTION AS PREVENTATIVE CARE just passed in the Senate as well?  This is MADNESS!

According to CBS News, there are ONE MILLION VETERANS WAITING for their disability claims RIGHT NOW through the Veterans Administration & we want to expand this bloated bureaucracy nationwide? More MADNESS:

You may be asking yourself. HOW DID THIS BILL GET PASSED? Well at first it was hopeful that AT LEAST A FEW Democrats would have a 'crisis of conscience" and vote against the Senate bill. However, their guilty conscience was quickly appeased with MILLIONS & MILLIONS of YOUR TAX DOLLARS. First, there was the $300 MILLION bribe to Senator Mary Landreiu (which is now known as the new "Louisiana Purchase"). Senator Landreiu was very public about her lack of support for the health care bill. She even told the press that "I can not be bought" But after she received YOUR MILLIONS for her State, she quickly changed her vote to "YES".

Then there was the "Nebraska Purchase" to Senator Ben Nelson. He was the last "holdout" in the Senate. First, the Whitehouse threatened to close Offutt Air Force Base in Nelson's home state if he did not vote "Yes". Once this threat was exposed in the media, the Democrats chose to fall back on the tried and true negotiation tactic known as "PAYOLA". After Senator Nelson & Senator Reid spent 13 hours behind closed doors. Senator Nelson (a former staunch advocate against funding abortions with tax dollars) ALL OF A SUDDEN changed his vote to a "YES". Why? Because his State would now be EXEMPT FROM PAYING ANY ADDITIONAL MEDICAID COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PASSAGE OF THIS BUREAUCRATIC MONSTROSITY! Funny how a MILLIONS OF YOUR TAX DOLLARS can "ease the conscience" of your elected officials!

Those are only 2 of the dirty back room deals cut by Harry Reid. For a complete list of every "dirty deed" see The Washington Post.

Here's how Harry Reid makes his back room deals:

How exactly can President Obama state that he "will not increase taxes on the middle class" if he allows these massive 1,990 & 2074 paged TRAIN WRECKS to pass? Does he not know what American's think about these bills? Did he not here us in Washington D.C on the steps of our nation's capitol at the "KILL THE BILL" rally on November 15, 2009?

OR on at the Code Red Rally on December 15, 2009?

JUST LOOK at all the new TAXES nestled deep in side these massive bills! Not to mention the $6.7 BILLION in new Premium Taxes!

Employer Mandate Excise Tax (Page 275): If an employer does not pay 72.5 percent of a single employee’s health premium (65  percent of a family employee), the employer must pay an excise tax equal to 8 percent of average wages.  Small employers (measured by payroll size) have smaller payroll tax rates of 0 percent (<$500,000), 2 percent ($500,000-$585,000), 4 percent ($585,000-$670,000), and 6 percent ($670,000-$750,000).

Individual Mandate Surtax (Page 296): If an individual fails to obtain qualifying coverage, he must pay an income surtax equal to the lesser of 2.5 percent of modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) or the average premium.  MAGI adds back in the foreign earned income exclusion and municipal bond interest.

Medicine Cabinet Tax (Page 324): Non-prescription medications would no longer be able to be purchased from health savings accounts (HSAs), flexible spending accounts (FSAs), or health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs).  nsulin excepted.

Cap on FSAs (Flexible Spending Accounts) (Page 325): FSAs would face an annual cap of $2500 (currently uncapped). 

Increased Additional Tax on Non-Qualified HSA Distributions (Page 326): Non-qualified distributions from HSAs would face an additional tax of 20 percent (current law is 10 percent).  This disadvantages HSAs relative to other tax-free accounts (e.g. IRAs, 401(k)s, 529 plans, etc.)

Denial of Tax Deduction for Employer Health Plans Coordinating with Medicare Part D (Page327): This would further erode private sector participation in delivery of Medicare services.

Surtax on Individuals and Small Businesses (Page 336): Imposes an income surtax of 5.4 percent on MAGI over $500,000
($1 million married filing jointly). MAGI adds back in the itemized deduction for margin loan interest. This would raise the top marginal tax rate in 2011 from 39.6 percent under current law to 45 percent—a new effective top rate.

Excise Tax on Medical Devices (Page 339): Imposes a new excise tax on medical device manufacturers equal to 2.5 percent of the wholesale price. It excludes retail sales and unspecified medical devices sold to the general public.

Corporate 1099-MISC Information Reporting (Page 344): Requires that 1099-MISC forms be issued to corporations as well as persons for trade or business payments. Current law limits to just persons for small business compliance complexity reasons. Also expands reporting to exchanges of property.

Delay in Worldwide Allocation of Interest (Page 345): Delays for nine years the worldwide allocation of interest, a corporate tax relief provision from the American Jobs Creation Act

Limitation on Tax Treaty Benefits for Certain Payments (Page 346): Increases taxes on U.S. employers with overseas operations looking to avoid double taxation of earnings.

Codification of the “Economic Substance Doctrine” (Page 349): Empowers the IRS to disallow a perfectly legal tax deduction or other tax relief merely because the IRS deems that the motive of the taxpayer was not primarily business-related.

Application of “More Likely Than Not” Rule (Page 357): Publicly-traded partnerships and corporations with annual gross receipts in excess of $100 million have raised standards on penalties.  If there is a tax underpayment by these taxpayers, they must be able to prove that the estimated tax paid would have more likely than not been sufficient to cover final tax liability.

How will ALL of these new taxes affect us? Forbes Magazine does a GREAT job of breaking it all down.

Senator Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) pointed out some VERY DISTURBING language in the Senate health care bill during floor remarks on 12/21/09. First, he noted that there are a number of changes to Senate rules in the bill--and it's supposed to take a 2/3 vote to change the rules! And then he pointed out that the Reid bill declares on page 1020 that the Independent Medicare Advisory Board cannot be repealed by future Congresses! This is unprecedented legislation that is tantamount to TYRANNY!
 

With all of the aforementioned evidence stacked against the health care bills. Senate Democrats STILL say Republicans are "evil" for opposing it. My favorite video showing the Democrat's "righteous indignation" towards Republicans was the recent drunken tirade by Max Baucus from the floor of the U.S. Senate. That's right, I said DRUNKEN tirade from the floor of the US Senate:



All of this insanity began last July, when the Congressional Budget Office scored the Democrat's HR3200 Health Insurance reform bill BEFORE Democrats  snuck 75 "phantom" amendments in to the bill (which were NOT scored by the CBO). On October 7th, 2009 the CBO was then commissioned to score the 1502 paged Senate reform bill hilariously named America's Healthy Future Act of 2009. The assessment (at first) seemed to be more favorable than the earlier score given to HR3200 back in July. That is of course, until Price Waterhouse Cooper exposed the TRUE COST of the Democrat's Health Insurance reform bills. Let's just say the word ROB doesn't even begin to describe what an abject failure the Democrats "reform" bills would be. Moreover, not only will the bills NOT be deficit neutral, they will actually end up costing Tax Payers dramatically more for their health insurance For excellent in depth video commentary on Price Waterhouse Cooper's cost analysis please watch the informative video below:

Democrats have made it clear that they believe that health care is a "Fundamental Right". However, no one seems to be discussing the "fundamental rights" we LOSE under both of these bills. In fact, if it were not for Patriotic American Tax Paying Citizens voicing their INFORMED dissent at Town Hall Meetings across the country AND the ONE MILLION NINE HUNDRED EIGHTY SIX THOUSAND Patriots who showed up in Washington D.C. on 09/12/09. President Obama and a Democrat controlled House & Senate would have MOST DEFINITELY passed HR3200 in it's original UGLY form!

The sad truth is the vast majority of the population (and the majority of Senators) have not bothered to actually READ the 1,000 plus paged HR3200 bill or the 1,502 paged "America's Healthy Future Act of 2009. To save us time  the U.S. Chamber of Commerce outlined the fundamental rights we loose under the HR3200 bill Click here to read their analysis. An even better in depth analysis was recently completed by...wait for it....an ACTUAL Insurance Broker with 22 years of experience in.....wait for it.....The Health Insurance Industry! What a concept! Consult with those who actually know what they're talking about! His excellent in depth analysis of the HR3200 bill can be found on his web site @ www.wrongreform.com

Regarding America's Healthy Choices Act. All you need to do is read
Section 2203 entitled "Guaranteed Issue and Renewal For Insurance Plans" (starting on Page 19). I
n this section we enter in to what I like to call "Lawmaker La La Land" where not only must an Insurance company COVER ALL APPLICANTS REGARDLESS OF PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS, but they also are PROHIBITED from charging ANYTHING EXTRA because of pre-existing conditions. For those that have no idea how health insurance works (like those in the Senate who actually wrote this ridiculous legislation) I'll quote (in part) directly from the Wall Street Journal article of 8/12/09.

"If insurers are forced to sell coverage to everyone at any time, many people will buy insurance only when they need medical care. This raises the cost of insurance for everyone else, in particular those who are responsible enough to buy  insurance before they need it; they end up paying even higher premiums. And the more expensive the insurance, the less likely people will buy it before they need it.

That's one reason that only five states—Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Vermont—have Mr. Obama's proposal for "guaranteed issue" on the books today. New Hampshire and Kentucky repealed such laws after finding that they soon had an even smaller individual insurance market as companies fled the state.

Another proposed reform known as "community rating" imposes uniform premiums regardless of health condition. This also blows up the individual insurance market, by making it far more expensive for young, healthy or low-risk consumers to join pools—if they join at all. And if the healthy don't join risk pools, then premiums go up for everyone and insurers have little choice but to reduce their risk by refusing to cover those who have a high chance of getting sick, such as people with a history of cancer. This is why 35 states today impose no limits whatsoever on how much insurers can vary premiums and six states allow wide variation among consumers.

New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts have both community rating and guaranteed issue. And, no surprise, they have the three most expensive individual insurance markets among all 50 states, with premiums roughly two to three times higher than the rest of the country. In 2007, the average annual premium in New Jersey was $5,326 for singles and in New York $12,254 for a family, versus the national average of $2,613 and $5,799, respectively. Obama Care would impose New York-type rates nationwide."

So you see Health Insurance is about MANAGEMENT of RISK. Insuring everyone regardless of medical history and without charging anything extra is actuarially UNSOUND. Since Health Insurance companies have to be fiscally responsible, such practices lead to unmanageable risk and in turn unaffordable premiums. This is exactly why a Federal "Public Option" could NEVER POSSIBLY be considered "Healthy Competition". Why? Because insurance companies can not tap in to the Federal reserve when claims exceed revenue. A Federal "Public Option" would most certainly do so (as the Federal Government has been doing feverishly lately).

This is clearly NOT the way to "reform" our health care system and this is why we have seen predominantly Liberal news outlets like The New York Post, The Huffington Post, Salon.com and The Washington Post vehemently condemn President Obama's "Health Care"...er...."Health Insurance" reform plans. Whilst both parties (and most American's) feel that something has to be done. The question is, what is the best course  of action?  There are still those who actually believe that a "Single Payer" system would be the best option. The President does not  agree, although he clearly stated his support for such a system prior to his election. Now, he is promoting the aforementioned  "Public  Option" which by all estimates will cost the U.S. Tax Payers between $1 and $2 Trillion over the next decade! Not to mention what happens AFTER the first decade!

As Investors Business Daily stated in their 07/31/09 article a Public option will most definitely not work. In fact, it's not about choices. It's about Government control of our health care decisions. This being the case, a Public Option is most definitely not the way to reform the U.S. health care system. This is why Congressman Mike Rogers of Michigan spoke with such passion at a Senate hearing this week regarding President Obama's Health Insurance "reform". After actually READING the bills, he had some genuine concerns and he was not afraid to voice them and boy did he EVER voice his concerns!


For those of you old enough to remember Jack Webb, you will thoroughly enjoy his thoughts on President Obama's plans here:

Nevertheless, we still definitely need health care reform on many levels and if Government must play a part, there are intelligent things they can do. Here’s where they can actually help:

  •  Eliminate the ridiculous State imposed Mandates that PROHIBIT Health Insurers from offering coverage in EVERY SINGLE STATE! For example, Small Businesses in California have roughly 6 (yes that's six) options for Health Insurance. Yet there are 1,300 Health Insurance companies in America! States like Colorado FORCE carriers to cover "substance abuse" which DOUBLES the Health Insurance premiums in Colorado (you can now waive "substance abuse" coverage and your premium is subsequently reduced BY HALF!). This kind of State Mandate (and so many more) is what prevent the majority of Health Insurance carriers from offering their products in every State.

    Basic economics 101 teaches us that NOTHING increases quality and drives down prices LIKE COMPETITION! How can we increase quality and competition when we stifle it by imposing ridiculous mandates that inhibit competition from the get go? All 1,300 Health Insurance carriers should be able to offer ALL of their products in EVERY SINGLE STATE. This way if you do not like your current coverage you have 1, 299 OTHER OPTIONS. With that many options available, carriers are NATURALLY FORCED BY THE RULES OF COMPETITION AND FREE MARKET ENTERPRISE to IMPROVE not only the quality of their products but to also improve their customer service OR THE CONSUMER WILL PURCHASE their Health Insurance from 1,299 other carriers! It's as simple as that! Also, actuarial tables teach us that the more lives that are in the pool, the lower the premiums for all. How much lower could premiums be if everyone in EVERY state had 1300 carriers to choose from? This is why I support the repeal of the outdated McCarran-Ferguson-Act of 1945
     

  •  Instead of bailing out GM with Billions of our blood sweat and tears and then letting them file bankruptcy 3 months later. Why not expand State Run High Risk Pools to ALL States for those who are rendered uninsurable? We already have such State Run High Risk Health Insurance pools in the majority of States. These Risk Pools will cover anyone regardless of their medical history. The problem is they are under funded so the premiums are extremely high. Instead of spending up to $2.6 TRILLION over the next decade to insure only 20 Million of the 45 Million uninsured. LEAVE the bulk of the nation's risk where the money is, namely with the insurance companies. Since the uninsured FAR outweigh the uninsurable, this would cost far less than the currently proposed $2.6 Trillion over the next 10 years.
     

  •  Update the outdated Health Insurance Portability laws (regarding credit for pre-existing conditions) to INCLUDE Individual Health Insurance Policies. As it stands now, HIPAA law allows an insured to move from one "Employer Sponsored Group Health Insurance Plan" to another "Employer Sponsored Group Health Insurance Plan" and receive FULL coverage for "pre-existing" conditions so long as they can prove to the new carrier that they have had 18 months of prior coverage with no lapse of more than 63 days. Millions of American Entrepreneurs have chosen to leave Corporate America and strike out on their own since these outdated laws were written in the 1990's. As the face of our work force changes so too should the laws that protect it. Most especially since these entrepreneurs shoulder the BULK of the nation's risk and PAY the bulk of the nation's tax load! Throw them a legal bone!
     

  •  Make ALL Health Insurance 100% TAX DEDUCTIBLE! I say ALL Health Insurance because employer sponsored health insurance IS 100% tax deductible BUT it's NOT tax deductible if you purchase your own Individual Health Insurance policy on the open market.
     

  •  Educate the American consumer about the primary reason for the high cost of health insurance! Namely, LOW DEDUCTIBLE, LOW CO PAY (a.k.a. Traditional) Health Insurance. NOTHING drives up the cost of Health Insurance like maintaining a low deductible, low co pay plan. Instead, offer new more intelligent option to the American Consumer like "Consumer Driven Tax Qualified Health Insurance". There simply is no more intelligent or cost effective way to insure anyone. The sad part is, these Consumer Driven Tax Qualified concepts have been around for more than a DECADE! Yet, only a small minority of the American population has even explored these intelligent (& much lower priced) Health Insurance alternatives. Those that have, are WAY AHEAD of the rest of population when it comes to managing medical risk.
     

  •  I would say weed out the 12 million Illegals (that we know about) who are sucking our Medicaid system dry...but as Congressman Joe Wilson so aptly stated, Obama CLEARLY wants to "provide a PATH TO CITIZENSHIP for the 10 to 12 million Illegals in our country". Once they're legal, he can then cover them ALL on our tax dollar! So YES his plan IS to cover Illegals, he'll just make em legal first! Think they're not sucking our Medicaid system dry? Just visit California or Illinois. Good old “Blago” enrolled thousands of Illegals in to our Medicaid system, thereby running the program in the ground & leaving our Illinois Medicaid system approx. $1.5 BILLION behind in payment of claims to physicians who have been providing “free” care to all illegals who were lucky enough to flock to the State of Illinois to insure themselves for “free”. In fact, according to the U.S. Census Bureau 10 to 12 Million of the Uninsured in America are illegal aliens. Who comprise the rest? Find out here.
     

  • TORT REFORM! This is one area of reform that is rarely spoken of by the Liberal left. Medical malpractice liability forces providers into practicing defensive medicine. In other words, it causes medical practitioners to order multiple expensive (and often times unnecessary) tests and procedures "in defense of" potential lawsuits, JUST IN CASE they miss something in a patient's case. All for fear of being sued for ridiculous amounts in a malpractice lawsuit. Limiting liability lawsuit awards to reasonable amounts will deter those who seek the "big pay day" by filing frivolous lawsuits against medical practitioner.
     

  •  Establish a Federal oversight committee to regulate and hold accountable physicians who make medical mistakes. What’s one of the biggest reasons why health care is so expensive? Hint: It’s not “rich CEO’s” and “outdated medical records transfer processes.” It’s Medical Mistakes! Here’s the real facts you won’t find in the media outlets:

1994: Five years after a groundbreaking Institute of Medicine report focused attention on medical errors in hospitals, Americans say that they do not believe that the nation’s quality of care has improved. In fact, 1 out of 3 patients states that they have experienced a serious medical error http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.w4.534

1995: A Study published in the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) found that only two percent of medication errors that occurred during the medication administration process were intercepted.
a. More people die from medication errors than from work place injuries
b. Medication errors account for approximately one out of 131 outpatient deaths and one out of 854 inpatient deaths.

1999: Institute of Medicine (IOM) releases its first report on healthcare quality and medical errors. http://www.iom.edu/?id=12735 The Study finds in part that:

    a. Medical errors are responsible for injury in as many as 1 out of every 25 hospital patients.
    b. Between 44,000 and 98,000 Americans die each year from preventable medical errors in hospitals alone.
    c. The deaths from preventable medical mistakes are equivalent to the number of people who would die if a jumbo     jet crashed EACH AND EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR, and all its passengers died!
    d. Medical errors cause more deaths than motor vehicle accidents, breast cancer or AIDS…..and this study is TEN     YEARS OLD and STILL no Federal oversight committee! Oh wait! It gets worse!

2002: A Study issued by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) concluded that more than 200,000 medication errors occurred during 2002

2004: CDC reports that 90,000 patient deaths occur each year due to patients contracting hospital acquired infections.  http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/nnis/2004NNISreport.pdf
    a. Many hospital acquired infections are caused by health care workers who fail to wash their hands in between patients.

2006: Studies assessing the state of hospital patient safety conclude that current progress is slow, results in general are at best modest, and the gap between the best possible care and actual care remains large.  http://www.healthgrades.com/media/dms/pdf/PatientSafetyInAmericanHospitalsStudy2006.pdf

More Facts:

Preventable medical errors result in extended hospital stays, expensive treatment for chronic medical conditions and astronomical medical costs that are associated with treating debilitating life-long illnesses. Some experts state that these costs may be in the range of $150-200 Billion dollars per year. Gee, where else could we spend that money??? Quick reminder:

ALL of the aforementioned happened under the nose of our Federal Government. And we want them to regulate Health Care?? Let’s not save ALL of our anger for the “greedy” insurance companies and “over paid” doctors and CEO’s. Let’s focus our Anger on our GOVERNMENT who has allowed this systemic problem to continue over three administrations!

Ask yourself, why does the health care industry basically regulate and report on itself? Why is certification and accreditation voluntary? Why don’t we have a Federal agency that acts like the FAA and investigate medical mistakes, just like airline accidents or near misses? Why do only some states have mandatory reporting requirements of medical errors? All Good Questions that need to be answered before we hand over our very health freedoms to the same Government to “regulate”.

In summary, REAL healthcare reform can be accomplished through consumer education, weeding out abuse of existing Federal entitlement programs (via a legitimate needs assessment) and increased funding and expansion of existing State sponsored Risk Pools so that people who are declined for insurance have an affordable option to continue coverage if declined on the individual major medical market. Following these few simple steps will go a long way towards not only maintaining our current health care system, but also towards keeping the bulk of our nations risk where it belongs, namely with the private health insurance industry. In light of the recent multi Trillion Dollar "Bail Outs" and many other failing corporations coming to the table with their hats in their hands (and their private jets on the tarmac) the last thing our government should do is start cutting more blind "bail out" checks in an effort to "reform" the U.S. health care system.

The big question is, why is Congress not listening to the cries of We The People? Listen to the frustration of this CA Small Biz Owner:



But hey what do I know? The video below sure makes Government sound wonderful! I mean just look at their track record!

What this Administration (and others before it) do not seem to understand are the basic fundamental principles and guidelines our Founders knew long before our current fiscal insolvency. For a refresher course on the wisdom of our Founders watch this:

By the way, unlike the lies told by the Democrats. Conservative Republicans DO HAVE a plan to reform our nation's health insurance system. It is called the "Empowering Patient's First Act" or HR3400. By the way, if you ever wondered what the differences are between Conservatives and Liberals this Power Point Presentation sums it up quite nicely.

Watch the brief Customer service videos below for a brief snapshot of what we have to look forward to under Obamacare:








Dick Morris breaks down what could really happen if Obamacare passes:

Now that you've read all this please take the "Red Pill" (in liquid form) to forget all about the nightmare described above:

Universal Health Care. What Are The Facts? Would It Work For The United States?

Since there are so many ideas on the table, it is difficult to know what the right course of action is. Most especially when you are on the outside looking in. Recently ABC's 20/20 program did an in depth study of this issue. The result of which clearly outlined the problems with the U.S. Health Care System and what needs to be done on a National scale  in order to truly reform our Health Care System. If you have not seen the 20/20 episode entitled "Sick in America"  with John Stossel. Please take the time to watch all 6 videos. It will take about 45 minutes of your time but it is well  worth it to know what's really going on and what can be done right now to truly reform the U.S. Health Care system.  Most importantly it can all be done without spending Trillions of U.S. Tax Payer Dollars. In fact, it will SAVE us money!

Sick in America" (Part 1 of 6)

"Sick in America" (Part 2 of 6)

"Sick in America" (Part 3 of 6)

"Sick in America" (Part 4 of 6)

"Sick in America" (Part 5 of 6)

"Sick in America" (Part 6 of 6)



A common example used to further the cause of adopting a Single Payer system in the United States is to point out how well it is working in countries such as France and Canada. 20/20 touches on this in the above episode. However, very few have done a more in depth study of Canada's Single Payer system than documentary film maker Stuart Browning. For even more about what is really going on with the Canadian  health care system please watch his short but very informative documentary videos below. Again, well worth your time.
 



What's it like JUST TO SEE A DOCTOR with Canada's Single Payer System? Watch Steven Crowder's hidden camera video:

Health Broker - Rick Baker (featured in the above film) asks you to help stop Congress from adopting Canada's system by signing the petition at www.freeourhealthcarenow.com Please help secure your rights to your own health care choices.

Why is Rick so passionate about his plea for your help in stopping the adoption of a Government Run Health Care System for all Americans? Because certain "progressive" states have already adopted such State Run Health Care Systems. Take a look at what happened to Barbara Wagner who was a victim of the "Oregon Public Health Insurance Plan". When Government runs ANYTHING it's all about price containment and not the Health & Welfare of the Patient.

Medical care in the United States is derided as miserable compared to health care systems in the rest of the developed world.  Economists, government officials, insurers and academics alike are beating the drum for a far larger government role in health care.  Much of the public assumes their arguments are sound because the calls for change are so ubiquitous and the topic so complex.  However, before turning to government as the solution, some unheralded facts about America's health care system should be considered, says Scott W. Atlas, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and a professor at the Stanford University Medical Center. 

Americans have better survival rates than Europeans for common cancers:

  • Breast cancer mortality is 52 percent higher in Germany than in the United States, and 88 percent higher in the United Kingdom.
  • Prostate cancer mortality is 604 percent higher in the United Kingdom and 457 percent higher in Norway.
  • The mortality rate for colorectal cancer among British men and women is about 40 percent higher.

Americans have better access to treatment for chronic diseases than patients in other developed countries:

  • Some 56 percent of Americans who could benefit are taking statins, which reduce cholesterol and protect against heart disease.
  • By comparison, of those patients who could benefit from these drugs, only 36 percent of the Dutch, 29 percent of the Swiss, 26 percent of Germans, 23 percent of Britons and 17 percent of Italians receive them.

Lower income Americans are in better health than comparable Canadians:

  • Twice as many American seniors with below-median incomes self-report "excellent" health compared to Canadian seniors (11.7 percent versus 5.8 percent).
  • Conversely, white Canadian young adults with below-median incomes are 20 percent more likely than lower income Americans to describe their health as "fair or poor."

Americans spend less time waiting for care than patients in Canada and the United Kingdom:

  • Canadian and British patients wait about twice as long -- sometimes more than a year -- to see a specialist, to have elective surgery like hip replacements or to get radiation treatment for cancer.
  • All told, 827,429 people are waiting for some type of procedure in Canada.
  • In England, nearly 1.8 million people are waiting for a hospital admission or outpatient treatment.

Source: Scott W. Atlas, "10 Surprising Facts About American Health Care," National Center for Policy Analysis, Brief Analysis No. 649, 3/24/09 http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=17770


 
Because of how the Single Payer System is designed, citizens of England & Canada have NO WHERE NEAR the choices that we as American citizens do. As a matter of fact, until very recently (2005) it was simply not possible for a Canadian citizen to pay for their own health care or to purchase private medical insurance that would "bump them up the long waiting list" for medical treatments. The reason Canadian citizens now have the right to do so (and it is still limited) is a direct result of long hard battles (many that are still being fought) that have been waged by brave Canadian citizens like Dr. Jacques Chaoulli who took his clients case all the way to the Canadian supreme court and won! Dr. Chaoulli (http://www.healthcoalition.ca/chaoulli.html) and his patient, George Zeliotis, launched their legal challenge to the Canadian government's monopolized healthcare system after waiting more than a year for hip-replacement surgery.
 
Canada's high court found for the plaintiffs and in doing so issued the following statement: "The evidence in this case shows that delays in the public healthcare system are widespread, and that, in some serious cases, patients die as a result of waiting lists for public healthcare. The evidence also demonstrates that the prohibition against private health insurance and its consequence of denying people vital healthcare result in physical and psychological suffering that meets a threshold test of seriousness." Furthermore, Justice Marie Deschamps said, "Many patients on non-urgent waiting lists are in pain and cannot fully enjoy any real quality of life. The right to life and to personal inviolability is therefore affected by the waiting times."

Furthermore, the Vancouver, British Columbia-based Fraser Institute which keeps track of Canadian waiting times for various medical procedures. According to the Fraser Institute's 14th annual edition of "Waiting Your Turn: Hospital Waiting Lists in Canada (2006)," total waiting time between referral from a general practitioner and treatment, averaged across all 12 specialties and 10 provinces surveyed, rose from 17.7 weeks in 2003 to 17.9 weeks in 2006. Depending on which Canadian province you live in, a simple MRI requires a wait between 7 and 33 weeks! Orthopedic surgery could require a wait of 14 weeks for a referral from a general practitioner to the specialist and then another 24 weeks from the specialist to treatment! For even more real life horror stories about Canadian citizens left in the lurch by the Canadian healthcare system read the well researched and fact based Wall Street Journal article entitled "Too Old For Hip Surgery" here: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123413701032661445.html?mod=article-outset-box This is what happens when you put government in control of your health care decisions. Doing so in this country, would be nothing short of a train wreck. Anyone who thinks otherwise is simply uninformed or "willfully ignorant".

What has our government done, to convince people to hand over our very health freedoms for it to govern over?
Katrina……..?
Fannie Mae – bailout? (this is a government entity who's employee's receive bonuses!) What other government employee receives bonuses for doing their jobs?
Social security – bankrupt ? (robbed for other expenditures)
Medicaid – ? (robbed for other expenditures)
$2 trillion Porkulus bill - ? (and growing)
AIG – bail out, yet nobody knows where's the money gone? No committee of oversight in place (was promised by our representatives to be in place immediately)
Gas prices - ? (50% of every dollar at the pump goes to Washington) But who did you point your finger at as the problem?

Since our government "cannot" be sued, how will one be able to be recompensed for its malfeasance or neglect? How will the government, once it tells 300 million people "go see the doctor we will pay all the bills", be able to control the consequences? By overwhelming our medical profession or breaking it, will come another "grand government solution," we need more money to fix it"! You are already familiar and have accepted this excuse for too long, and know this to be their power solution. Our government has impoverished our families' financial freedom to pay our own way, by immoral taxation. Want to know what such a government endeavor will cost the U.S. Tax Payer? Read the April 12, 2009 Wall Street Journal article entitled "The End of Private Health Insurance" http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123958544583612437.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Even more suggestions towards reforming the US Healthcare system were made by United Healthcare CEO, Stephen J. Hemsley. Read his suggestions made on 4/9/09
 http://www.insurancebroadcasting.com/insurance-news-042009-3.htm

Find out what's really driving the increase in Health Insurance premiums. Read the in depth study by the Institute of Health Care Knowledge published May 2009:  http://www.wellpoint.com/pdf/Premium%20Cost%20Drivers.pdf

Is Health Care A Fundamental Right? If So What Should Governments Role Be?

As a multi-state Licensed Broker/Agent, I have been providing quality Health Insurance services for hundreds of families  and Small Businesses around the country for the last 15 years and I have seen first hand how WELL our health care system  works and how well our Health Insurance system works. I have seen first hand (over and over again) what happens when  a Health Insurance company pays claims (by the hundreds of thousands) thereby protecting the financial future of their  insured and ensuring that they receive the very best medical treatment. Specifically by allowing them access to  expensive  medical  procedures that they could never afford on their own. I have also helped many consumers obtain  access to legitimate major medical Health Insurance even if they were labeled as "uninsurable" on the open market.

 Yet time and time again, I read how "evil" insurance companies are and how greedy their CEOs are and how they  routinely deny medical procedures and refuse coverage to those who are "deserving" of such coverage. I have also heard  many times how health care should be a "basic fundamental right" of all Americans. Even though, none of our  founding  fathers had any such "fundamental rights" in mind when crafting our Bill of Rights or our Constitution. Yet nearly  half of  the U.S. population thinks that we should turn entirely to the U.S. Government for the answer to health care  reform.  They feel as though a "Public Option" that would "compete" with private industry would solve the problem. Or worse yet they want a "Single Payer" system much like Canada has now.

You may be wondering yourself, is Government the solution? The late President Ronald Reagan summed it up best when he said: “Government is not the solution, it is the problem”. But way before him, our forefathers warned of INSIDIOUS government involvement in our daily lives. Look at their wisdom hundreds of years before our present situation:

Regarding adopting failed Single Payer health care options like other foreign governments have. What did Washington say? “Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence, (I conjure you to believe me fellow citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake; since HISTORY AND EXPERIENCE prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of Republican Government".

Washington again at his Farewell Address, September 19, 1796. Regarding using others blood sweat and tears to pay for those who have not earned: What did Jefferson say? “ To take from one, because it is thought that his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers have NOT exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry, and the fruits acquired by it.”

How does this apply today?

46% of American’s pay absolutely no INCOME taxes! That means the rest of us have the privilege of paying for all entitlements (which are ever expanding). Most recent case in point:

Last year, SCHIP covered about 7 million low-income children and Medicaid covered an additional 23 million. This year, 2009, the U.S House of Representatives passed the H.R.2 SCHIP Expansion Bill which adds another 6.5 million children to Medicaid. In fact, according to U.S. Census Bureau data, 42 million children will now be eligible. The bill also allows States to receive federal reimbursement for adding more immigrant children and pregnant immigrant mothers, and removes the 5 year waiting period now required for legal immigrants to be eligible. This would enable immigrants to become eligible for health benefits the moment they get here!

Currently, the present income eligibility cap is $44,000 for a family of 4. The new bill raised the Medicaid limit to $66,000. New York will even include families who earn $88,000 and other states allow families to subtract from their income calculation what they spend on rent or mortgage or heating or food or transportation. This means that children in some families who have incomes well over $100,000 will now be eligible. With the median U.S. household income around $50,000, 60% of U.S. households still earning less than $62,000. This means that 3 out of 5 American households will now qualify for free health care for their children. It also means that the other 2 out of 5 households will have the burden of paying for all of this!

Back to our forefathers: Jefferson’s Letter to Joseph Milligan, April 6, 1816: ” There lies the distinction of “charity” or coercion. Here stands Jefferson who feared that if citizens became lazy, apathetic, and IRRESPONSIBLE, government would gain ground and become tyrannical and corrupt, plundering taxpayers for special interests and violating even property rights and other freedoms.”

How does this apply today?

With the help of the U.S. Census Bureau, let’s break down the real empirical data behind the “50 million uninsured” in America. Who exactly are they? FACTS:

  •  17 Million live in households earning more than $50,000 (38% of American uninsured)

  •  9 Million live in households earning more than $75,000 (20% of American uninsured)

  •  18 Million of the “young invincibles” (ages 18-34) who spend more money on “cigarettes, entertainment & cell  phone bills. (40% of uninsured)

  •  14 Million are eligible for Medicaid and SCHIP due to low income and do not enroll. (31% of uninsured)
        Watch “Uninsured in America”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKCWbq18bNk&feature=channel_page

  •  There are also 12 Million illegal aliens (and growing) who don't buy Health Insurance but still get "free" health care.

    So how many are legitimately uninsured? About 8 Million. That's just 18% of the 45 Million we constantly here about.

Back to our Forefathers: Jefferson again: “We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt ($3 Trillion Dollar “Porkulus Maximus” Bill) We must make our election between economy and liberty, or Profusion and servitude. If we run into such debts, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our callings and our creeds, as the people of England are, our people, like them, must come to labor sixteen hours in the twenty-four, give the earnings of fifteen of these to the government for their debts and daily expenses; and the sixteenth being insufficient to afford us bread, we must live, as they now do, on OATMEAL and potatoes; have no time to think, no means of calling the mismanagers to account; (government) but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their CHAINS on the necks of our fellow-sufferers…private fortunes are destroyed by public (government) as well private extravagance. Till the bulk of the society is reduced to be mere automations of misery……than begins, indeed, the bellum omnium in omnia (War of all against all) …..and the fore horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression.” (Letter to Samuel Kerchival, July 12, 1816)

How does this apply today?

Where is the outrage that our children already, BEFORE BEING BORN are now in debt to the government by $35,000 ! Nice immoral profit I say by our government and we haven’t even begun down the slippery slope to “Universal Health Care.” Even before we begin, the $3 Trillion “Porkulus Maximus” Bail Out continues to grow as more and more corporations come to the capital with their hat in their hands and their private jets on the tarmac.

Back to our Forefathers: Jefferson again: “To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he DISBELIEVES and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” – Thomas Jefferson

John Adams (Vice President US for 2 terms 1788-1796, and in 1796 became our Second President) On taxation : “Property is surely a right of mankind as real as liberty. Perhaps, at first, prejudice, habit, shame or fear, principle or religion would restrain the poor from attacking the rich, and the idle from usurping on the industrious; but the time would not be long before courage and enterprise (political opportunists) would come and pretexts be invented (socialist agenda) by degrees to countenance the majority in dividing all the property among them, or at least in sharing it equally with its present possessors. Debts would be abolished first; taxes laid HEAVY on the rich, and not at all on the others; (46% of American’s pay NO income tax) and at last a downright equal division of everything be demanded, and voted. What would be the consequence of this? The idle, the vicious, the intemperate would rush into the utmost extravagance of debauchery, sell and spend all their share, and than demand a NEW division of those who PURCHASED from them.’

Thomas Pain (1737–1809) “If, from the more wretched parts of the old world, we look at those which are in an advanced stage of improvement, we still find the greedy hand of government thrusting itself into every corner and crevice of industry, and grasping the spoil of the multitude. Invention is continually exercised, to furnish new pretenses for revenues and taxation. It watches prosperity as its prey and permits none to escape without tribute.”

Daniel Webster (1782-1852) “An unlimited power to tax involves, necessarily, the power to DESTROY.”

How do these comments apply today?

If taxation strengthens a government, while relieving it’s citizens of the freedoms above forewarned from our Forefathers, how can anyone believe taxing Americans at 60% or more (to fund a "public option") is the solution? What else could stifle personal drive and achievement more than even more taxation?

Regarding a “Public Option.” There are several reasons why a Public Option will not work. Firstly, the private sector can not compete with a Public Option. So the lie that it will just create “healthy competition” is just that. An INSIDIOUS Lie perpetrated by a Government with an unholy lust for even more power. Why is it a lie?

Because unlike the Federal Government who can tap in to the U.S. Treasury (as they have been doing feverishly lately) when claims surpass revenue. The private sector is held to a higher standard. Namely, fiscal responsibility. If claims supercede revenue, an insurance company must be held to the ramifications that happen to any company that does not balance it’s portfolio correctly. Namely, FAILURE (except, of course if that company is AIG who gets bailed out over AND OVER again by our precious BLOOD SWEAT and TEARS)!

SIDE BAR: Quick Translation of the term “Blood Sweat & Tears” for the aforementioned 46%. “Blood Sweat & Tears” means income taxes.

SIDE BAR: Further clarification of the term “income tax”. This is a percentage of income that is forcibly taken from roughly half of the American population when they produce an income.

Once the insurance companies fail (shortly after the “Public Option” starts promoting “Healthy Competition”) we will be left with “Medicare” for all! But wait! How’s Medicaid & Medicare working now? Let’s see. At the current rate of Medicare expenditures, by the time I am 65 there will be no Medicare for me according to ALL economist (on both sides of the isle). Why? Because they have been robbed for other expenditures by a fiscally irresponsible, over burdensome Federal Government. Who’s answer to EVERYTHING is to throw money at it! Easy to throw when it’s not yours.

The private sector does not have the luxury to play with America’s BLOOD SWEAT & TEARS. We must balance our portfolios responsibly and consistently or we will not have the the funds to pay the big claims when they arise (and they do arise, and they do so often). This being the case, it comes down to who the American Tax Payers (again, I stress the 50% that actually pay income taxes) want to handle their medical care. And overwhelming, those tax payers want choice and fiscal responsibility. They will receive neither through a government run “Public Option.”

Ok, well then we’ll just lean on Medicaid. Really? Will that be before or after the recent Medicaid Expansion of $87 Billion is used up or after the 78.2 MILLION Baby Boomers suck it dry to care for their long term care expenses? Gimme a break!

By the way, ever wonder why 35 Million American's don’t purchase Health Insurance? Because it’s FREE!!! There are hundreds of Free Hospitals & Clinics around the country: http://www.healthcentral.com/diabetes/c/17/66884/affordable-medical
Add to that the “compassionate care” that any one can get at every Emergency Room in the U.S. and is there any wonder why so many choose not to insure themselves? But that’s the point here. NOTHING is “free”! It’s all on the backs of the 54% of American’s who actually pay income taxes and this already MASSIVE burden will increase exponentially once Health Care is “FREE” for everyone!

Does this mean then that we should stop providing for those who are truly in need? Of course not. In fact, providing for those who are truly in need is one of the things that makes America great. We not only provide for those in our own country but we spill our precious blood on foreign soil around the globe defending the rights of our allies and protecting Liberty. We will continue to do so. My point is that what used to be entitlements for those who legitimately need them has now become entitlements for those who can MOST CERTAINLY provide for themselves.

What our forefathers envisioned was a “Just Society”. A Society that grows great upon the efforts of each citizens efforts and yet remembers that there are those amongst us WHO CAN NOT (due to infirmity, age, mental disability, disenfranchisement etc.) And we have always provided for those who are truly in need. And we will continue to do so.

Fiscal Conservatives believe wholeheartedly in helping those that are truly in need. But those that are not truly in need should PROVIDE FOR THEMSELVES! The decision to help those truly in need should be made by the hearts and minds of the individual citizen, not funded through increased tax dollars by an ever encroaching government.

Bill & Melinda Gates have contributed Billions of dollars to humanitarian efforts inside and out of this country. Oprah Winfrey has done the same, to name just a few. But no one told them they HAD to. No one forcibly took that money (other than the Millions in taxes they already forfeit to the government). Instead, their hearts were motivated to do so and this is the crux of the matter. Free citizens do not need their Government to tell them how to spend their money. Free citizens do not need their Government encroaching on their very lively hoods. And MOST IMPORTANTLY Free Citizens can certainly spend their money better than the Federal Government. Why? Because they have a vested interest in where that money goes due to the fact that they have EARNED it!

By the way, those that believe that we have a moral obligation to provide everyone with "free" health care, and feel compelled to do make sure that happens, should VOLUNTARILY pay more taxes for such programs. Those that do not, should not be forced to do so. This is the definition of a free society.

Medicaid Expansion Buckles Under The Stress of "Open Enrollment"

I have been an insurance broker in the state of Illinois for the past 15 years and I have seen first hand what happens when an over burdened, tax funded, Government controlled, entitlement program like Medicaid is offered to those with incomes well into the middle class.

Last year, SCHIP covered about 7 million low-income children and Medicaid covered an additional 23 million. This year, 2009, the U.S House of Representatives passed the H.R.2 SCHIP Expansion Bill which adds another 6.5 million children to Medicaid.

In fact, according to U.S. Census Bureau data, 42 million children will now be eligible. The bill also allows States to receive federal reimbursement for adding more immigrant children and pregnant immigrant mothers, and removes the 5 year waiting period now required for legal immigrants to be eligible. This would enable immigrants to become eligible for health benefits the moment they get here.

Currently, the present income eligibility cap is $44,000 for a family of 4. The new bill raised the Medicaid limit to $66,000. New York will even include families who earn $88,000 and other states allow families to subtract from their income calculation what they spend on rent or mortgage or heating or food or transportation. This means that  children in some families who have incomes well over $100,000 will now be eligible.

With the median U.S. household income around $50,000, 60% of U.S. households still earning less than $62,000.  This means that 3 out of 5 American households will now qualify for free health care for their children. It also means that the other 2 out of 5 household will have the burden of paying for all of this!

Let's take a look to see how some of these programs are doing. Click here to read about the Medicaid "expansion" program enacted in my home State, Illinois, by our recently impeached and now infamous Democratic Governor Rod Blagojevich.

In fact, Blago was so "generous" that he expanded these Medicaid entitlement programs to include a defunct
"All Kids Covered" plan, a defunct "Mom's & Babies" plan and an equally defunct "Family Care" plan.

These entitlement programs were designed to provide FREE health insurance coverage to all low income women who are currently pregnant (Mom's & Babies) and all children - here legally or ILLEGALLY (All Kids Covered) but they were also to provide FREE health insurance to all low income mothers of children who are insured under the "All Kids Covered" program (Family Care).

Now, one does not need to study actuarial science to quickly conclude that these types of entitlement expansion programs simply can not continue to work without massive and endless influxes of tax payer dollars. In fact, the State of Illinois is currently $1.5 Billion (yes, that's BILLION) behind in payment of claims to medical practitioners who have already provided treatment to program recipients. Furthermore, submitted claims by unpaid practitioners have accrued a potential liability of $81 million in interest due to payment delays over the past 8 years. Read more about the problems with claims payments
here

Update: As of January 2009 a moratorium has been placed on the sliding scale portion of the Illinois Family Care and the Mom's & Babies program. One can only wonder why. Could it be due to lack of funding?

Illinois had been lauded as the "Flagship" state for all others to follow regarding the expansion of the Medicaid entitlement programs. If this is the template for all others to follow, then god help us all, or at least those of us that actually fund the Medicaid system through our hard earned tax dollars.

Weighty decisions such as expanding the Medicaid system to virtually "All Kids" regardless of their actual need, simply can not be made based entirely on emotion! Prudent decision makers must weigh the desire to help all mankind against fiscal REALITY. There simply is not enough money to provide such irresponsible expansions of the Medicaid program.

This is the real reason why President Bush
vetoed the SCHIP program after the $780,000,000,000 (BILLION) "Porkulus Maximus" Bailout Bill passed in the Senate which was pushed hard by the Democratic Party. Of course, despite the caution of conservatives in the Republican party, the SCHIP bill did pass both the House and
Senate in 2009.

But how can we afford to pay for such entitlement programs? Should we limit these programs to those that truly cannot afford to purchase individual health insurance on the open market? How will we determine who is deserving of such entitlements (e.g. legal residents of this country who actually qualify during a legitimate needs assessment.)

What about personal responsibility? Should we also pay for the middle class if they can afford to purchase health insurance on their own?

Expansion of these entitlement programs to the middle class may be well meaning, but it is undoubtedly a fiscally irresponsible act that will end up crippling the already over burdened system.

We might not feel the direct impact of this now, but we most certainly will when all of the "Baby Boomers" start entering the Assisted Living and Long Term Care arena. Should we just let Boomers who don't have the forethought to purchase Long Term Care insurance off of the financial hook while taxpayers shoulder the burden?  

Today, those of us who are in need of health insurance have many options to choose from and, contrary to popular belief many of these options are priced very affordably.

An integral part of being personally responsible is that you take the time to explore ALL of your options so you can fiscally sound decisions BEFORE leaning on a an already over burdened Medicaid system.

If you have other options, you should never leave any decisions up government bureaucrats, especially your healthcare.

Uninsured Americans Charged More For Medical Treatment

If you are one of the 46.6 million Americans that have joined the ranks of the uninsured, what you may not know is that you may have to pay more for your medical treatment than your privately insured counterparts. If those without insurance get sick, they usually have to pay much more for the same medical services, since insurance companies can negotiate discounts with doctors, hospitals, pharmacies, and others health care providers. This means that the average uninsured working man or woman who suffers a mild heart attack can be stuck with a hospital bill that is in excess of $30,000 compared to the $10,000, negotiated rate, which is charged to an insured patient's private insurance carrier. In many cases, uninsured individuals are charged 3-4 times more for the exact same medical treatment that is administered to patients with private insurance.

Additionally, uninsured patient with huge medical bills are usually aggressively pursued by collection agencies and new bankruptcy laws make it extremely difficult to discharge medical debt. If you don't have health insurance coverage, you have a 25% greater chance of developing a life-threatening disease or condition than those with health insurance.  Here are some startling statistics from the National Institute of Medicine (IOM) - an arm of the National Academy of Sciences:

  1. Lack of health insurance causes 18,000 unnecessary deaths per year

  2. Adults without health insurance coverage have a 25% greater chance of dying from a disease or condition than those with health insurance coverage

  3. The nation spends $65 to $130 billon a year in lost resources because of diminished health and premature deaths relating to uninsured Americans

Today, there are more uninsured Americans than any point in history. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, approximately 15.9 percent of Americans are walking around without health insurance coverage and paying for medical expenses out of pocket. Although treatment for a sore throat or broken ankle can be a manageable medical expense for some families, more expensive treatments like surgery or chemotherapy can be financially devastating. If you are the type of person that wouldn't risk driving your vehicle without car insurance, consider the fact that there is a statistically greater chance that you will suffer from an illness or injury than an auto accident.

http://www.wikio.fr

Blog Flux Local

Finance

Top Blogs

Health blogs 

© Copyright 2000 S.B.I.S. Inc.